diff options
| author | Petr Cech <pcech@redhat.com> | 2015-10-27 04:02:46 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek@redhat.com> | 2015-11-14 13:08:06 +0100 |
| commit | a6a5a08a357d2adbb653b81bacc602ca3543c4c4 (patch) | |
| tree | 0452d00bd99c8102d7d1eb0cde91995d9fe8378d /src/tests | |
| parent | 6ae53d7b54ec2ece9fb51ed92c097f5ba8f9d849 (diff) | |
| download | sssd-a6a5a08a357d2adbb653b81bacc602ca3543c4c4.tar.gz sssd-a6a5a08a357d2adbb653b81bacc602ca3543c4c4.tar.xz sssd-a6a5a08a357d2adbb653b81bacc602ca3543c4c4.zip | |
TEST: Add test_users_by_recent_filter_valid
Test users_by_filter_valid() was removed in past. We will add two new
tests instead of it. Logic of those tests is connected to RECENT
filter. It returns only records which have been wrote or updated
after filter was created (or another given time).
users_by_filter_valid() --> user_by_recent_filter_valid()
users_by_recent_filter_valid()
The first of new tests, user_by_recent_filter_valid(), counts with
two users. One is stored before filter request creation and the second
user is stored after filter request creation. So filter returns only one
user.
The second of new tests, users_by_recent_filter_valid(), counts with
three users. One is stored before filter request creation and two
users are stored after filter request creation. So filter returns two
users.
This patch adds users_by_recent_filter_valid().
Resolves:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2730
Reviewed-by: Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/tests')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/tests/cmocka/test_responder_cache_req.c | 63 |
1 files changed, 62 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/tests/cmocka/test_responder_cache_req.c b/src/tests/cmocka/test_responder_cache_req.c index 439084c8..df3bd869 100644 --- a/src/tests/cmocka/test_responder_cache_req.c +++ b/src/tests/cmocka/test_responder_cache_req.c @@ -318,7 +318,6 @@ static void check_group(struct cache_req_test_ctx *test_ctx, assert_string_equal(exp_dom->name, test_ctx->domain->name); } - struct tevent_req * __wrap_sss_dp_get_account_send(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, struct resp_ctx *rctx, @@ -1317,6 +1316,67 @@ void test_user_by_recent_filter_valid(void **state) assert_string_equal(ldbname, TEST_USER_NAME); } +void test_users_by_recent_filter_valid(void **state) +{ + struct cache_req_test_ctx *test_ctx = NULL; + TALLOC_CTX *req_mem_ctx = NULL; + struct tevent_req *req = NULL; + const char **user_names = NULL; + const char **ldb_results = NULL; + const char *ldbname = NULL; + errno_t ret; + + test_ctx = talloc_get_type_abort(*state, struct cache_req_test_ctx); + test_ctx->create_user1 = true; + test_ctx->create_user2 = true; + + ret = sysdb_store_user(test_ctx->tctx->dom, TEST_USER_NAME3, + "pwd", 1002, 1002, NULL, NULL, NULL, + "cn="TEST_USER_NAME3",dc=test", + NULL, NULL, 1000, time(NULL)-1); + assert_int_equal(ret, EOK); + + req_mem_ctx = talloc_new(test_ctx->tctx); + check_leaks_push(req_mem_ctx); + + /* Filters always go to DP */ + will_return(__wrap_sss_dp_get_account_send, test_ctx); + mock_account_recv_simple(); + + /* User TEST_USER1 and TEST_USER2 are created with a DP callback. */ + req = cache_req_user_by_filter_send(req_mem_ctx, test_ctx->tctx->ev, + test_ctx->rctx, + test_ctx->tctx->dom->name, + TEST_USER_PREFIX); + assert_non_null(req); + + tevent_req_set_callback(req, cache_req_user_by_filter_test_done, test_ctx); + + ret = test_ev_loop(test_ctx->tctx); + assert_int_equal(ret, ERR_OK); + assert_true(check_leaks_pop(req_mem_ctx)); + + assert_non_null(test_ctx->result); + assert_int_equal(test_ctx->result->count, 2); + + user_names = talloc_array(test_ctx, const char *, 2); + assert_non_null(user_names); + user_names[0] = TEST_USER_NAME; + user_names[1] = TEST_USER_NAME2; + + ldb_results = talloc_array(test_ctx, const char *, 2); + assert_non_null(ldb_results); + for (int i = 0; i < 2; ++i) { + ldbname = ldb_msg_find_attr_as_string(test_ctx->result->msgs[i], + SYSDB_NAME, NULL); + assert_non_null(ldbname); + ldb_results[i] = ldbname; + } + + assert_string_not_equal(ldb_results[0], ldb_results[1]); + + assert_true(tc_are_values_in_array(user_names, ldb_results)); +} void test_users_by_filter_filter_old(void **state) { @@ -1557,6 +1617,7 @@ int main(int argc, const char *argv[]) new_multi_domain_test(group_by_id_multiple_domains_notfound), new_single_domain_test(user_by_recent_filter_valid), + new_single_domain_test(users_by_recent_filter_valid), new_single_domain_test(users_by_filter_filter_old), new_single_domain_test(users_by_filter_notfound), |
