systemtap-steved - Unnamed repository; edit this file to name it for gitweb.

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	Make inlinedvars empty asm really empty.	Mark Wielaard	2009-08-25	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \| \|	A debug "nop" was accidentially left in the asm statement that should have been totally empty. * testsuite/systemtap.base/inlinedvars.c (m): Really empty asm.
*	PR10537 process().function().label() should select multiple inlined instances.	Mark Wielaard	2009-08-20	1	-5/+8
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	This is less useful than one would hope. gcc will often emit a label with a DW_AT_low_pc that is not really in the neighbourhood of where one would expect it when the label is inlined and gcc can proof the label isn't really used in the optimized code. dwflpp::iterate_over_labels will now really iterate recursively through the die, even for dies without a name (like lexical blocks). This means we should now always find the concrete inlined label instances that have a real DW_AT_low_pc and so we don't need the trick to use the line table to get at the actual address. * dwflpp.cxx (iterate_over_labels): Accept dies without a name. Don't handle labels without a name or without a lowpc attribute. * testsuite/systemtap.base/inlinedvars.c (m): Trick gcc into thinking label is always used. (call, call2): Activate. (main): Call call and call2. * testsuite/systemtap.base/inlinedvars.exp: New result_string. Test both unoptimized and optimized (inlined) builds.
*	Add testcase for PR10533 (inlined vars) and 10537 (inlined labels - disabled)	Mark Wielaard	2009-08-18	1	-0/+43
	Partial testcase for PR10533 (inlined vars) and 10537 (inlined labels) currently we cannot use the full testcase since stap doesn't support probing multiple instances of inlined labels. * testsuite/systemtap.base/inlinedvars.exp: New file. * testsuite/systemtap.base/inlinedvars.stp: Likewise. * testsuite/systemtap.base/inlinedvars.c: Likewise.