| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Test what upgrades work when there is another lease already held,
in addition to the lease to be upgraded.
The summary of the behaviour is this:
-------------------------------------
If we have two leases (lease1 and lease2) on the same file,
then attempt to upgrade lease1 results in a change if and only
if the requested lease state:
- is valid,
- is strictly a superset of lease1, and
- can held together with lease2.
In that case, the resuling lease state of the upgraded lease1
is the state requested in the upgrade. lease2 is not broken
and remains unchanged.
Note that this contrasts the case of directly opening with
an initial requested lease state, in which case you get that
portion of the requested state that can be shared with the
already existing leases (or the states that they get broken to).
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Nov 11 18:04:47 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The summary of the behaviour is this:
-------------------------------------
An uncontended lease upgrade results in a change
if and only if the requested lease state is
- valid, and
- strictly a superset of the lease state already held.
In that case the resulting lease state is the one
requested in the upgrade.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
Autobuild-User(master): Richard Sharpe <sharpe@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Apr 27 18:09:37 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
|
| |
|
|
| |
util.c for re-use
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
util.c for re-use
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
lease.multibreak test
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
combinations
Autobuild-User: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Tue Nov 1 04:58:03 CET 2011 on sn-devel-104
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This must have been a typo (listing EXCLUSIVE twice).
But BATCH and EXCLUSIVE oplocks apparently share the
same break semantics with respect to leases.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is consistent with the test names used by selftest, should
make the names less confusing and easier to integrate with other tools.
Autobuild-User: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sat Dec 11 04:16:13 CET 2010 on sn-devel-104
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
the merged variant is renamed to smb_msleep as some platforms already have a
msleep function.
|
| |
|
|
| |
This reduces compile time somewhat.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
