| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Mar 2 03:57:34 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
this test shows that a change to POSIX ACL->SD mapping behavior does not invalidate the stored SD
Signed-off-by: Christian Ambach <ambi@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NT4 is long dead, and we should not change which ACL we return based
on what we think the client is. The reason we should not do this, is
that if we are using vfs_acl_xattr then the hash will break if we do.
Additionally, it would require that the python VFS interface set the
global remote_arch to fake up being a modern client.
This instead seems cleaner and removes untested code (the tests are
updated to then handle the results of the modern codepath).
The supporting 'acl compatability' parameter is also removed.
Andrew Bartlett
Reviewed by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This creates a new xattr.tdb per unit test, which avoids once and for all
the issue of dev/inode reuse.
For test_setposixacl_dir_getntacl_smbd the file ownership also set specifically.
Andrew Bartlett
Reviewed-by: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is important because it covers the codepath which had the talloc
error fixed by commit 60cf4cb5a630506747431ecbf00d890509baf2f3
(vfs_acl_common: In add_directory_inheritable_components allocate on
psd as parent)
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Nov 11 15:48:10 CET 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This manages the temp file more reliably, and reduces the repeated
code in each test case.
Pair-Programmed-With: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Oct 27 04:37:58 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If we do not provide a way to remove files from xattr.tdb, we can re-use the inode.
Andrew Bartlett
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This covers the case where we have a valid hash of the posix ACL (or the NT ACL from the
POSIX ACL) and we notice it no longer matches.
Andrew Bartlett
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This tries to show the difference between the cases where we trap
the POSIX ACL change and where we actually detect an OS-level change.
Andrew Bartlett
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This tests the mapping of posix ACLs to NT ACLs, the invalidation of
NT ACLs stored as an xattr and ensures this security-critical code
continues to work in the long term.
Andrew Bartlett
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Oct 25 10:05:16 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The issue here is that if we set S-1-5-32-544 (administrators) to a
GID only, then users cannot force a mandetory profile to be owned by
administrators (which is a requirement).
There is no particularly useful reason for us to enforce this matching
a system group.
Andrew Bartlett
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Autobuild-User(master): Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Sep 16 15:58:04 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a clearer, long-term-stable structure we can hash without
risking it changing.
Andrew Bartlett
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Andrew Bartlett
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Sep 4 11:30:17 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We are trying to test combinations of setting and getting via the VFS
and directly to the underlying DB.
Andrew Bartlett
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Needing to be able to write this test is the primary reason I have
been reworking the VFS and posix ACL layer over the past few weeks.
By exposing the POSIX ACL as a IDL object we can eaisly manipulate it
in python, and then verify that the ACL was handled correctly.
This ensures the when we write an ACL in provision, that it will
indeed allow that access at the FS layer.
We need to extend this beyond just the critical two ACLs set during
provision, to also include some special (hard) cases involving the
merging of ACE entries, as this is the most delicate part of the ACL
transfomation.
A similar test should also be written to read the posix ACL and the
mapped NT ACL on a file that has never had an NT ACL set.
Andrew Bartlett
|
|
This is the start of what will be a series of tests confirming exactly how
some NT ACLs are mapped to posix ACLs.
Andrew Bartlett
|