summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/source/smbd/share_access.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGerald Carter <jerry@samba.org>2006-02-03 22:19:41 +0000
committerGerald (Jerry) Carter <jerry@samba.org>2007-10-10 11:06:23 -0500
commit17e63ac4ed8325c0d44fe62b2442449f3298559f (patch)
tree19a0c31c817c9bc26fd53485b5348ab4af127a23 /source/smbd/share_access.c
parent50c894a6e949d4d3579926650674f381a821a671 (diff)
downloadsamba-17e63ac4ed8325c0d44fe62b2442449f3298559f.tar.gz
samba-17e63ac4ed8325c0d44fe62b2442449f3298559f.tar.xz
samba-17e63ac4ed8325c0d44fe62b2442449f3298559f.zip
r13316: Let the carnage begin....
Sync with trunk as off r13315
Diffstat (limited to 'source/smbd/share_access.c')
-rw-r--r--source/smbd/share_access.c264
1 files changed, 264 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/source/smbd/share_access.c b/source/smbd/share_access.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..11e52b03ab8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/source/smbd/share_access.c
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
+/*
+ Unix SMB/CIFS implementation.
+ Check access based on valid users, read list and friends
+ Copyright (C) Volker Lendecke 2005
+
+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ (at your option) any later version.
+
+ This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+ Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
+*/
+
+#include "includes.h"
+
+/*
+ * No prefix means direct username
+ * @name means netgroup first, then unix group
+ * &name means netgroup
+ * +name means unix group
+ * + and & may be combined
+ */
+
+static BOOL do_group_checks(const char **name, const char **pattern)
+{
+ if ((*name)[0] == '@') {
+ *pattern = "&+";
+ *name += 1;
+ return True;
+ }
+
+ if (((*name)[0] == '+') && ((*name)[1] == '&')) {
+ *pattern = "+&";
+ *name += 2;
+ return True;
+ }
+
+ if ((*name)[0] == '+') {
+ *pattern = "+";
+ *name += 1;
+ return True;
+ }
+
+ if (((*name)[0] == '&') && ((*name)[1] == '+')) {
+ *pattern = "&+";
+ *name += 2;
+ return True;
+ }
+
+ if ((*name)[0] == '&') {
+ *pattern = "&";
+ *name += 1;
+ return True;
+ }
+
+ return False;
+}
+
+static BOOL token_contains_name(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
+ const char *username,
+ const char *sharename,
+ const struct nt_user_token *token,
+ const char *name)
+{
+ const char *prefix;
+ DOM_SID sid;
+ enum SID_NAME_USE type;
+
+ if (username != NULL) {
+ name = talloc_sub_basic(mem_ctx, username, name);
+ }
+ if (sharename != NULL) {
+ name = talloc_string_sub(mem_ctx, name, "%S", sharename);
+ }
+
+ if (name == NULL) {
+ /* This is too security sensitive, better panic than return a
+ * result that might be interpreted in a wrong way. */
+ smb_panic("substitutions failed\n");
+ }
+
+ if (!do_group_checks(&name, &prefix)) {
+ if (!lookup_name(mem_ctx, name, LOOKUP_NAME_ALL,
+ NULL, NULL, &sid, &type)) {
+ DEBUG(5, ("lookup_name %s failed\n", name));
+ return False;
+ }
+ if (type != SID_NAME_USER) {
+ DEBUG(5, ("%s is a %s, expected a user\n",
+ name, sid_type_lookup(type)));
+ return False;
+ }
+ return nt_token_check_sid(&sid, token);
+ }
+
+ for (/* initialized above */ ; *prefix != '\0'; prefix++) {
+ if (*prefix == '+') {
+ if (!lookup_name(mem_ctx, name,
+ LOOKUP_NAME_ALL|LOOKUP_NAME_GROUP,
+ NULL, NULL, &sid, &type)) {
+ DEBUG(5, ("lookup_name %s failed\n", name));
+ return False;
+ }
+ if ((type != SID_NAME_DOM_GRP) &&
+ (type != SID_NAME_ALIAS) &&
+ (type != SID_NAME_WKN_GRP)) {
+ DEBUG(5, ("%s is a %s, expected a group\n",
+ name, sid_type_lookup(type)));
+ return False;
+ }
+ if (nt_token_check_sid(&sid, token)) {
+ return True;
+ }
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (*prefix == '&') {
+ if (user_in_netgroup(username, name)) {
+ return True;
+ }
+ continue;
+ }
+ smb_panic("got invalid prefix from do_groups_check\n");
+ }
+ return False;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check whether a user is contained in the list provided.
+ *
+ * Please note that the user name and share names passed in here mainly for
+ * the substitution routines that expand the parameter values, the decision
+ * whether a user is in the list is done after a lookup_name on the expanded
+ * parameter value, solely based on comparing the SIDs in token.
+ *
+ * The other use is the netgroup check when using @group or &group.
+ */
+
+BOOL token_contains_name_in_list(const char *username,
+ const char *sharename,
+ const struct nt_user_token *token,
+ const char **list)
+{
+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx;
+
+ if (list == NULL) {
+ return False;
+ }
+
+ mem_ctx = talloc_new(NULL);
+ if (mem_ctx == NULL) {
+ smb_panic("talloc_new failed\n");
+ }
+
+ while (*list != NULL) {
+ if (token_contains_name(mem_ctx, username, sharename,
+ token, *list)) {
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return True;
+ }
+ list += 1;
+ }
+
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return False;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check whether the user described by "token" has access to share snum.
+ *
+ * This looks at "invalid users", "valid users" and "only user/username"
+ *
+ * Please note that the user name and share names passed in here mainly for
+ * the substitution routines that expand the parameter values, the decision
+ * whether a user is in the list is done after a lookup_name on the expanded
+ * parameter value, solely based on comparing the SIDs in token.
+ *
+ * The other use is the netgroup check when using @group or &group.
+ */
+
+BOOL user_ok_token(const char *username, struct nt_user_token *token, int snum)
+{
+ if (lp_invalid_users(snum) != NULL) {
+ if (token_contains_name_in_list(username, lp_servicename(snum),
+ token,
+ lp_invalid_users(snum))) {
+ DEBUG(10, ("User %s in 'invalid users'\n", username));
+ return False;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (lp_valid_users(snum) != NULL) {
+ if (!token_contains_name_in_list(username,
+ lp_servicename(snum), token,
+ lp_valid_users(snum))) {
+ DEBUG(10, ("User %s no in 'valid users'\n", username));
+ return False;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (lp_onlyuser(snum)) {
+ const char *list[2];
+ list[0] = lp_username(snum);
+ list[1] = NULL;
+ if (!token_contains_name_in_list(NULL, lp_servicename(snum),
+ token, list)) {
+ DEBUG(10, ("%s != 'username'\n", username));
+ return False;
+ }
+ }
+
+ DEBUG(10, ("user_ok_token: share %s is ok for unix user %s\n",
+ lp_servicename(snum), username));
+
+ return True;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check whether the user described by "token" is restricted to read-only
+ * access on share snum.
+ *
+ * This looks at "invalid users", "valid users" and "only user/username"
+ *
+ * Please note that the user name and share names passed in here mainly for
+ * the substitution routines that expand the parameter values, the decision
+ * whether a user is in the list is done after a lookup_name on the expanded
+ * parameter value, solely based on comparing the SIDs in token.
+ *
+ * The other use is the netgroup check when using @group or &group.
+ */
+
+BOOL is_share_read_only_for_token(const char *username,
+ struct nt_user_token *token, int snum)
+{
+ BOOL result = lp_readonly(snum);
+
+ if (lp_readlist(snum) != NULL) {
+ if (token_contains_name_in_list(username,
+ lp_servicename(snum), token,
+ lp_readlist(snum))) {
+ result = True;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (lp_writelist(snum) != NULL) {
+ if (token_contains_name_in_list(username,
+ lp_servicename(snum), token,
+ lp_writelist(snum))) {
+ result = False;
+ }
+ }
+
+ DEBUG(10,("is_share_read_only_for_user: share %s is %s for unix user "
+ "%s\n", lp_servicename(snum),
+ result ? "read-only" : "read-write", username));
+
+ return result;
+}