blob: 12e36360fe6f1fd9ce0c91ffdf7caaf1f88f7890 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
|
class Puppet::Parser::AST
# A reference to an object. Only valid as an rvalue.
class ObjectRef < AST::Branch
attr_accessor :name, :type
def each
[@type,@name].flatten.each { |param|
#Puppet.debug("yielding param %s" % param)
yield param
}
end
# Evaluate our object, but just return a simple array of the type
# and name.
def evaluate(hash)
scope = hash[:scope]
objtype = @type.safeevaluate(:scope => scope)
objnames = @name.safeevaluate(:scope => scope)
# it's easier to always use an array, even for only one name
unless objnames.is_a?(Array)
objnames = [objnames]
end
# See if we can look the object up in our scope tree.
begin
object = scope.lookuptype(objtype)
rescue Puppet::ParseError => except
except.line = self.line
except.file = self.file
raise except
rescue => detail
error = Puppet::ParseError.new(detail)
error.line = self.line
error.file = self.file
error.backtrace = detail.backtrace
raise error
end
# If the type isn't defined, verify that it's builtin
unless object or Puppet::Type.type(objtype)
error = Puppet::ParseError.new("Could not find type %s" %
objtype.inspect)
error.line = self.line
error.file = self.file
raise error
end
# should we implicitly iterate here?
# yes, i believe that we essentially have to...
ret = objnames.collect { |objname|
if object.is_a?(AST::Component)
objname = "%s[%s]" % [objtype,objname]
objtype = "component"
end
[objtype,objname]
}.reject { |obj| obj.nil? }
# Return a flattened array, since we know that we've created an
# array
return *ret
end
def tree(indent = 0)
return [
@type.tree(indent + 1),
@name.tree(indent + 1),
((@@indline * indent) + self.typewrap(self.pin))
].join("\n")
end
def to_s
return "%s[%s]" % [@name,@type]
end
end
end
|
