summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAnivar Aravind <anivar.aravind@gmail.com>2013-06-03 20:46:52 +0530
committerAnivar Aravind <anivar.aravind@gmail.com>2013-06-03 20:46:52 +0530
commitc81276375623d67019b7cee13d56e5fdf39d10ca (patch)
tree825cb77d4ef0e59335dcf2fe53fe62425e593ad2
parent7f6d4c1bc3b77827e25e45532b9cd00f01eadf08 (diff)
downloadlogbook-of-an-observer-c81276375623d67019b7cee13d56e5fdf39d10ca.tar.gz
logbook-of-an-observer-c81276375623d67019b7cee13d56e5fdf39d10ca.tar.xz
logbook-of-an-observer-c81276375623d67019b7cee13d56e5fdf39d10ca.zip
Removed Footnote
-rw-r--r--conference-ict.tex4
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/conference-ict.tex b/conference-ict.tex
index effadd8..276ed63 100644
--- a/conference-ict.tex
+++ b/conference-ict.tex
@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ Third day i attended only for very less time. Interestingly, the round table was
In short, the conference just did the opposite of what it should have done. It helped in accelerating some processes, which I think might have happened even if they didn’t intervene. It did nothing on policy level, no decisions on lobbying govt. for freeing up its technologies related to accessibility(at the least). More over, it gave chance for some to play the big daddy or mommy in the field and dictate to people who work on the field on what to do(thankfully, at least consortium had enough thinking heads to counter it). This was a good opportunity for a lot of people to make a mark, and I do believe they indeed made a mark in their progress card, just that it is in red.
+\begin{flushright}(13 December, 2009)\end{flushright}
+
\subsection*{Comments}
\begin{itemize}
\item sankarshan Says:
@@ -64,5 +66,5 @@ It might take sometime since, its hard for me to find time right now.
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
-\begin{flushright}(13 December, 2009)\footnote{A draft blog post shared with Anivar}\end{flushright}
+
\end{english}