summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/source3/smbd/blocking.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>2003-04-04 20:38:25 +0000
committerJeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>2003-04-04 20:38:25 +0000
commitdb5f60098a9baa6685ff63d173ef94952f6c4f7a (patch)
treea212a2cf64239b798befdeb8052cea71d0ab68d0 /source3/smbd/blocking.c
parentf72611917fd0c80b66fa603c85e5e58e6acea973 (diff)
downloadsamba-db5f60098a9baa6685ff63d173ef94952f6c4f7a.tar.gz
samba-db5f60098a9baa6685ff63d173ef94952f6c4f7a.tar.xz
samba-db5f60098a9baa6685ff63d173ef94952f6c4f7a.zip
Fix for very subtle POSIX lock interaction race condition found by
Herb. We need to unlock POSIX locks before notifying pending lock processes. Jeremy. (This used to be commit eb861e9d0fd79bbd9401ced8e55fe603c2aa7c1e)
Diffstat (limited to 'source3/smbd/blocking.c')
-rw-r--r--source3/smbd/blocking.c12
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/source3/smbd/blocking.c b/source3/smbd/blocking.c
index 581ce43f91..2802fbb151 100644
--- a/source3/smbd/blocking.c
+++ b/source3/smbd/blocking.c
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ file %s fnum = %d\n", blr->com_type, fsp->fsp_name, fsp->fnum ));
brl_unlock(blr->fsp->dev, blr->fsp->inode, blr->fsp->fnum,
blr->lock_pid, sys_getpid(), blr->fsp->conn->cnum,
- blr->offset, blr->count, True);
+ blr->offset, blr->count, True, NULL, NULL);
free_blocking_lock_record((blocking_lock_record *)ubi_slRemNext( &blocking_lock_queue, prev));
blr = (blocking_lock_record *)(prev ? ubi_slNext(prev) : ubi_slFirst(&blocking_lock_queue));
@@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ file %s fnum = %d\n", blr->com_type, fsp->fsp_name, fsp->fnum ));
blocking_lock_reply_error(blr,NT_STATUS_CANCELLED);
brl_unlock(blr->fsp->dev, blr->fsp->inode, blr->fsp->fnum,
blr->lock_pid, sys_getpid(), blr->fsp->conn->cnum,
- blr->offset, blr->count, True);
+ blr->offset, blr->count, True, NULL, NULL);
free_blocking_lock_record((blocking_lock_record *)ubi_slRemNext( &blocking_lock_queue, prev));
blr = (blocking_lock_record *)(prev ? ubi_slNext(prev) : ubi_slFirst(&blocking_lock_queue));
continue;
@@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ void process_blocking_lock_queue(time_t t)
brl_unlock(fsp->dev, fsp->inode, fsp->fnum,
blr->lock_pid, sys_getpid(), conn->cnum,
- blr->offset, blr->count, True);
+ blr->offset, blr->count, True, NULL, NULL);
blocking_lock_reply_error(blr,NT_STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT);
free_blocking_lock_record((blocking_lock_record *)ubi_slRemNext( &blocking_lock_queue, prev));
@@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ void process_blocking_lock_queue(time_t t)
brl_unlock(fsp->dev, fsp->inode, fsp->fnum,
blr->lock_pid, sys_getpid(), conn->cnum,
- blr->offset, blr->count, True);
+ blr->offset, blr->count, True, NULL, NULL);
free_blocking_lock_record((blocking_lock_record *)ubi_slRemNext( &blocking_lock_queue, prev));
blr = (blocking_lock_record *)(prev ? ubi_slNext(prev) : ubi_slFirst(&blocking_lock_queue));
@@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ void process_blocking_lock_queue(time_t t)
brl_unlock(fsp->dev, fsp->inode, fsp->fnum,
blr->lock_pid, sys_getpid(), conn->cnum,
- blr->offset, blr->count, True);
+ blr->offset, blr->count, True, NULL, NULL);
free_blocking_lock_record((blocking_lock_record *)ubi_slRemNext( &blocking_lock_queue, prev));
blr = (blocking_lock_record *)(prev ? ubi_slNext(prev) : ubi_slFirst(&blocking_lock_queue));
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ void process_blocking_lock_queue(time_t t)
brl_unlock(fsp->dev, fsp->inode, fsp->fnum,
blr->lock_pid, sys_getpid(), conn->cnum,
- blr->offset, blr->count, True);
+ blr->offset, blr->count, True, NULL, NULL);
free_blocking_lock_record((blocking_lock_record *)ubi_slRemNext( &blocking_lock_queue, prev));
blr = (blocking_lock_record *)(prev ? ubi_slNext(prev) : ubi_slFirst(&blocking_lock_queue));