summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/common/legalnotice-content-en.xml
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* updating copyright yearKarsten Wade2007-04-221-71/+0
|
* Point all XML snippets to the correct entities files.Paul W. Frields2007-03-221-1/+1
|
* Sorry, I perpetrated this mistake that carried on through translation; 'and ↵Karsten Wade2006-03-211-2/+2
| | | | others' covers every individual contributor, aiui.
* Bad XML, no cookie.Karsten Wade2006-02-281-1/+1
|
* Fix terminology and XMLize ulinkPaul W. Frields2006-02-221-1/+1
|
* Expanding the copyright properly and removing reliance on future versions of ↵Karsten Wade2006-02-201-5/+4
| | | | a license we haven't seen yet. :)
* Extraneous quotation mark I missed.docs-common-new-canonical-legal-notice-using-OPLKarsten Wade2006-02-201-5/+6
|
* *docs* Milestone -- changing licensing in CVS license to OPL. Note that you ↵Karsten Wade2006-02-201-13/+26
| | | | want to use an earlier version to build existing documentst that do not yet have agreement from copyright holders to relicense. Pobably best not to rebuild those docs anyway, but over the next few weeks it could be necessary until we remove all non-OPL content entirely. This notice now uses the OPL, references the Fedora trademarks, continues to reference Red Hat trademarks, and now has a pointer to the export control section of fp.org.
* This makes everything work out nicely, PROVIDED that doc authors don't use ↵Paul W. Frields2006-02-121-2/+9
| | | | &FDP-INFO; any more, and instead use a standard XInclude statement. Shouldn't cause much pain at all.
* Make sure we use XMLPaul W. Frields2006-02-121-1/+1
|
* Hacks to get the release-notes to build, on the way to a better world.Karsten Wade2006-02-121-8/+10
|
* Trying to make the legal notice files come into the XInclude scenario more ↵Karsten Wade2006-02-111-0/+11
| | | | smoothly. What I have here is broken still, but in a new way ... and I'm hoping it carries us closer. Committing for collaboration.
* Changes toward making the XInclude version work, perhaps all need to be ↵Karsten Wade2006-02-071-41/+1
| | | | valid XML docs.
* Use new entity nomenclature properlyPaul W. Frields2005-12-281-1/+1
|
* I know of my own knowledge that Red Hat legal has approved this identical ↵FC-5-TEST1-LATESTKarsten Wade2005-10-311-1/+8
| | | | change to the Red Hat Enterprise Linux legalnotice, as evidenced by the changes to said notice in Enterprise Linux 4. I am backporting these changes to the derivative legalnotice for Fedora documentation. This change does not reduce or increase our legal obligation, afaik. This does not change the substance of this legalnotice in anyway. IANAL.
* This is just a little hackish. With the legalnotice inline, it ruined the ↵Karsten Wade2005-06-031-0/+71
effect of the new release notes style and what's new content. These changes, plus changes to the relnotes parent, pull a special relnotes legalnotice in that has a single sentence and links to an appendix with the full legalnotice content. This is not semantically correct, there must be a way to handle this in the XSL so that the legalnotice content is properly contained throughout. This hack can stand until I find the XSL fix, because sometimes Pretty is more important than Right.