1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
|
<html>
<head>
<title>writing rsyslog output plugins (developer's guide)</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Writing Rsyslog Output Plugins</h1>
<p>This page is the begin of some developer documentation for writing output
plugins. Doing so is quite easy (and that was a design goal), but there currently
is only sparse documentation on the process available. I was tempted NOT to
write this guide here because I know I will most probably not be able to
write a complete guide.
<p>However, I finally concluded that it may be better to have same information
and pointers than to have nothing.
<h2>Getting Started and Samples</h2>
<p>The best to get started with rsyslog plugin development is by looking at
existing plugins. All that start with "om" are <b>o</b>utput <b>m</b>odules. That
means they are primarily thought of being message sinks. In theory, however, output
plugins may aggergate other functionality, too. Nobody has taken this route so far
so if you would like to do that, it is highly suggested to post your plan on the
rsyslog mailing list, first (so that we can offer advise).
<p>The rsyslog distribution tarball contains two plugins that are extremely well
targeted for getting started:
<ul>
<li>omtemplate
<li>omstdout
</ul>
Plugin omtemplate was specifically created to provide a copy template for new output
plugins. It is bare of real functionality but has ample comments. Even if you decide
to start from another plugin (or even from scratch), be sure to read omtemplate source
and comments first. The omstdout is primarily a testing aide, but offers support for
the two different parameter-passing conventions plugins can use (plus the way to
differentiate between the two). It also is not bare of functionaly, only mostly
bare of it ;). But you can actually execute it and play with it.
<p>In any case, you should also read the comments in ./runtime/module-template.h.
Output plugins are build based on a large set of code-generating macros. These
macros handle most of the plumbing needed by the interface. As long as no
special callback to rsyslog is needed (it typically is not), an output plugin does
not really need to be aware that it is executed by rsyslog. As a plug-in programmer,
you can (in most cases) "code as usual". However, all macros and entry points need to be
provided and thus reading the code comments in the files mentioned is highly suggested.
<p>In short, the best idea is to start with a template. Let's assume you start by
copying omtemplate. Then, the basic steps you need to do are:
<ul>
<li>cp ./plugins/omtemplate ./plugins/your-plugin
<li>mv cd ./plugins/your-plugin
<li>vi Makefile.am, adjust to your-plugin
<li>mv omtemplate.c your-plugin.c
<li>cd ../..
<li>vi Makefile.am configure.ac
<br>search for omtemplate, copy and modify (follow comments)
</ul>
<p>Basically, this is all you need to do ... Well, except, of course, coding
your plugin ;). For testing, you need rsyslog's debugging support. Some useful
information is given in "<a href="troubleshoot.html">troubleshooting rsyslog</a>
from the doc set.
<h2>Special Topics</h2>
<h3>Threading</h3>
<p>Rsyslog uses massive parallel processing and multithreading. However, a plugin's entry
points are guaranteed to be never called concurrently <b>for the same action</b>.
That means your plugin must be able to be called concurrently by two or more
threads, but you can be sure that for the same instance no concurrent calls
happen. This is guaranteed by the interface specification and the rsyslog core
guards against multiple concurrent calls. An instance, in simple words, is one
that shares a single instanceData structure.
<p>So as long as you do not mess around with global data, you do not need
to think about multithreading (and can apply a purely sequential programming
methodology).
<p>Please note that duringt the configuraton parsing stage of execution, access to
global variables for the configuration system is safe. In that stage, the core will
only call sequentially into the plugin.
<h3>Getting Message Data</h3>
<p>The doAction() entry point of your plugin is provided with messages to be processed.
It will only be activated after filtering and all other conditions, so you do not need
to apply any other conditional but can simply process the message.
<p>Note that you do NOT receive the full internal representation of the message
object. There are various (including historical) reasons for this and, among
others, this is a design decision based on security.
<p>Your plugin will only receive what the end user has configured in a $template
statement. However, starting with 4.1.6, there are two ways of receiving the
template content. The default mode, and in most cases sufficient and optimal,
is to receive a single string with the expanded template. As I said, this is usually
optimal, think about writing things to files, emailing content or forwarding it.
<p>The important philosophy is that a plugin should <b>never</b> reformat any
of such strings - that would either remove the user's ability to fully control
message formats or it would lead to duplicating code that is already present in the
core. If you need some formatting that is not yet present in the core, suggest it
to the rsyslog project, best done by sending a patch ;), and we will try hard to
get it into the core (so far, we could accept all such suggestions - no promise, though).
<p>If a single string seems not suitable for your application, the plugin can also
request access to the template components. The typical use case seems to be databases, where
you would like to access properties via specific fields. With that mode, you receive a
char ** array, where each array element points to one field from the template (from
left to right). Fields start at arrray index 0 and a NULL pointer means you have
reached the end of the array (the typical Unix "poor man's linked list in an array"
design). Note, however, that each of the individual components is a string. It is
not a date stamp, number or whatever, but a string. This is because rsyslog processes
strings (from a high-level design look at it) and so this is the natural data type.
Feel free to convert to whatever you need, but keep in mind that malformed packets
may have lead to field contents you'd never expected...
<p>If you like to use the array-based parameter passing method, think that it
is only available in rsyslog 4.1.6 and above. If you can accept that your plugin
will not be working with previous versions, you do not need to handle pre 4.1.6 cases.
However, it would be "nice" if you shut down yourself in these cases - otherwise the
older rsyslog core engine will pass you a string where you expect the array of pointers,
what most probably results in a segfault. To check whether or not the core supports the
functionality, you can use this code sequence:
<pre>
<code>
BEGINmodInit()
rsRetVal localRet;
rsRetVal (*pomsrGetSupportedTplOpts)(unsigned long *pOpts);
unsigned long opts;
int bArrayPassingSupported; /* does core support template passing as an array? */
CODESTARTmodInit
*ipIFVersProvided = CURR_MOD_IF_VERSION; /* we only support the current interface specification */
CODEmodInit_QueryRegCFSLineHdlr
/* check if the rsyslog core supports parameter passing code */
bArrayPassingSupported = 0;
localRet = pHostQueryEtryPt((uchar*)"OMSRgetSupportedTplOpts", &pomsrGetSupportedTplOpts);
if(localRet == RS_RET_OK) {
/* found entry point, so let's see if core supports array passing */
CHKiRet((*pomsrGetSupportedTplOpts)(&opts));
if(opts & OMSR_TPL_AS_ARRAY)
bArrayPassingSupported = 1;
} else if(localRet != RS_RET_ENTRY_POINT_NOT_FOUND) {
ABORT_FINALIZE(localRet); /* Something else went wrong, what is not acceptable */
}
DBGPRINTF("omstdout: array-passing is %ssupported by rsyslog core.\n", bArrayPassingSupported ? "" : "not ");
if(!bArrayPassingSupported) {
DBGPRINTF("rsyslog core too old, shutting down this plug-in\n");
ABORT_FINALIZE(RS_RET_ERR);
}
</code>
</pre>
<p>The code first checks if the core supports the OMSRgetSupportedTplOpts() API (which is
also not present in all versions!) and, if so, queries the core if the OMSR_TPL_AS_ARRAY mode
is supported. If either does not exits, the core is too old for this functionality. The sample
snippet above then shuts down, but a plugin may instead just do things different. In
omstdout, you can see how a plugin may deal with the situation.
<p><b>In any case, it is recommended that at least a graceful shutdown is made and the
array-passing capability not blindly be used.</b> In such cases, we can not guard the
plugin from segfaulting and if the plugin (as currently always) is run within
rsyslog's process space, that results in a segfault for rsyslog. So do not do this.
<h3>Batching of Messages</h3>
<p>Starting with rsyslog 4.3.x, batching of output messages is supported. Previously, only
a single-message interface was supported.
<p>With the <b>single message</b> plugin interface, each message is passed via a separate call to the plugin.
Most importantly, the rsyslog engine assumes that each call to the plugin is a complete transaction
and as such assumes that messages be properly commited after the plugin returns to the engine.
<p>With the <b>batching</b> interface, rsyslog employs something along the line of
"transactions". Obviously, the rsyslog core can not make non-transactional outputs
to be fully transactional. But what it can is support that the output tells the core which
messages have been commited by the output and which not yet. The core can than take care
of those uncommited messages when problems occur. For example, if a plugin has received
50 messages but not yet told the core that it commited them, and then returns an error state, the
core assumes that all these 50 messages were <b>not</b> written to the output. The core then
requeues all 50 messages and does the usual retry processing. Once the output plugin tells the
core that it is ready again to accept messages, the rsyslog core will provide it with these 50
not yet commited messages again (actually, at this point, the rsyslog core no longer knows that
it is re-submiting the messages). If, in contrary, the plugin had told rsyslog that 40 of these 50
messages were commited (before it failed), then only 10 would have been requeued and resubmitted.
<p>In order to provide an efficient implementation, there are some (mild) constraints in that
transactional model: first of all, rsyslog itself specifies the ultimate transaction boundaries.
That is, it tells the plugin when a transaction begins and when it must finish. The plugin
is free to commit messages in between, but it <b>must</b> commit all work done when the core
tells it that the transaction ends. All messages passed in between a begin and end transaction
notification are called a batch of messages. They are passed in one by one, just as without
transaction support. Note that batch sizes are variable within the range of 1 to a user configured
maximum limit. Most importantly, that means that plugins may receive batches of single messages,
so they are required to commit each message individually. If the plugin tries to be "smarter"
than the rsyslog engine and does not commit messages in those cases (for example), the plugin
puts message stream integrity at risk: once rsyslog has notified the plugin of transacton end,
it discards all messages as it considers them committed and save. If now something goes wrong,
the rsyslog core does not try to recover lost messages (and keep in mind that "goes wrong"
includes such uncontrollable things like connection loss to a database server). So it is
highly recommended to fully abide to the plugin interface details, even though you may
think you can do it better. The second reason for that is that the core engine will
have configuration settings that enable the user to tune commit rate to their use-case
specific needs. And, as a relief: why would rsyslog ever decide to use batches of one?
There is a trivial case and that is when we have very low activity so that no queue of
messages builds up, in which case it makes sense to commit work as it arrives.
(As a side-note, there are some valid cases where a timeout-based commit feature makes sense.
This is also under evaluation and, once decided, the core will offer an interface plus a way
to preserve message stream integrity for properly-crafted plugins).
<p>The second restriction is that if a plugin makes commits in between (what is perfectly
legal) those commits must be in-order. So if a commit is made for message ten out of 50,
this means that messages one to nine are also commited. It would be possible to remove
this restriction, but we have decided to deliberately introduce it to simpify things.
<h3>Output Plugin Transaction Interface</h3>
<p>In order to keep compatible with existing output plugins (and because it introduces
no complexity), the transactional plugin interface is build on the traditional
non-transactional one. Well... actually the traditional interface was transactional
since its introduction, in the sense that each message was processed in its own
transaction.
<p>So the current <code>doAction()</b> entry point can be considered to have this
structure (from the transactional interface point of view):
<p><pre><code>
doAction()
{
beginTransaction()
ProcessMessage()
endTransaction()
}
</code></pre>
<p>For the <b>transactional interface</b>, we now move these implicit <code>beginTransaction()</code>
and <code>endTransaction(()</code> call out of the message processing body, resulting is such
a structure:
<p><pre><code>
beginTransaction()
{
/* prepare for transaction */
}
doAction()
{
ProcessMessage()
/* maybe do partial commits */
}
endTransaction()
{
/* commit (rest of) batch */
}
</code></pre>
<p>And this calling structure actually is the transactional interface! It is as simple as this.
For the new interface, the core calls a <code>beginTransaction()</code> entry point inside the
plugin at the start of the batch. Similarly, the core call <code>endTransaction()</code> at the
end of the batch. The plugin must implement these entry points according to its needs.
<p>But how does the core know when to use the old or the new calling interface? This is rather
easy: when loading a plugin, the core queries the plugin for the <code>beginTransaction()</code>
and <code>endTransaction()</code> entry points. If the plugin supports these, the new interface is
used. If the plugin does not support them, the old interface is used and rsyslog implies that
a commit is done after each message. Note that there is no special "downlevel" handling
necessary to support this. In the case of the non-transactional interface, rsyslog considers
each completed call to <code>doAction</code> as partial commit up to the current message.
So implementation inside the core is very straightforward.
<p>Actually, <b>we recommend that the transactional entry points only be defined by those
plugins that actually need them</b>. All others should not define them in which case
the default commit behaviour inside rsyslog will apply (thus removing complexity from the
plugin).
<p>In order to support partial commits, special return codes must be defined for
<code>doAction</code>. All those return codes mean that processing completed successfully.
But they convey additional information about the commit status as follows:
<p>
<table border="0">
<tr>
<td valign="top"><i>RS_RET_OK</i></td>
<td>The record and all previous inside the batch has been commited.
<i>Note:</i> this definition is what makes integrating plugins without the
transaction being/end calls so easy - this is the traditional "success" return
state and if every call returns it, there is no need for actually calling
<code>endTransaction()</code>, because there is no transaction open).</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><i>RS_RET_DEFER_COMMIT</i></td>
<td>The record has been processed, but is not yet commited. This is the
expected state for transactional-aware plugins.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><i>RS_RET_PREVIOUS_COMMITTED</i></td>
<td>The <b>previous</b> record inside the batch has been committed, but the
current one not yet. This state is introduced to support sources that fill up
buffers and commit once a buffer is completely filled. That may occur halfway
in the next record, so it may be important to be able to tell the
engine the everything up to the previouos record is commited</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Note that the typical <b>calling cycle</b> is <code>beginTransaction()</code>,
followed by <i>n</i> times
<code>doAction()</code></n> followed by <code>endTransaction()</code>. However, if either
<code>beginTransaction()</code> or <code>doAction()</code> return back an error state
(including RS_RET_SUSPENDED), then the transaction is considered aborted. In result, the
remaining calls in this cycle (e.g. <code>endTransaction()</code>) are never made and a
new cycle (starting with <code>beginTransaction()</code> is begun when processing resumes.
So an output plugin must expect and handle those partial cycles gracefully.
<p><b>The question remains how can a plugin know if the core supports batching?</b>
First of all, even if the engine would not know it, the plugin would return with RS_RET_DEFER_COMMIT,
what then would be treated as an error by the engine. This would effectively disable the
output, but cause no further harm (but may be harm enough in itself).
<p>The real solution is to enable the plugin to query the rsyslog core if this feature is
supported or not. At the time of the introduction of batching, no such query-interface
exists. So we introduce it with that release. What the means is if a rsyslog core can
not provide this query interface, it is a core that was build before batching support
was available. So the absence of a query interface indicates that the transactional
interface is not available. One might now be tempted the think there is no need to do
the actual check, but is is recommended to ask the rsyslog engine explicitely if
the transactional interface is present and will be honored. This enables us to
create versions in the future which have, for whatever reason we do not yet know, no
support for this interface.
<p>The logic to do these checks is contained in the <code>INITChkCoreFeature</code> macro,
which can be used as follows:
<p><pre><code>
INITChkCoreFeature(bCoreSupportsBatching, CORE_FEATURE_BATCHING);
</code></pre>
<p>Here, bCoreSupportsBatching is a plugin-defined integer which after execution is
1 if batches (and thus the transational interface) is supported and 0 otherwise.
CORE_FEATURE_BATCHING is the feature we are interested in. Future versions of rsyslog
may contain additional feature-test-macros (you can see all of them in
./runtime/rsyslog.h).
<p>Note that the ompsql output plugin supports transactional mode in a hybrid way and
thus can be considered good example code.
<h2>Open Issues</h2>
<ul>
<li>Processing errors handling
<li>reliable re-queue during error handling and queue termination
</ul>
<h3>Licensing</h3>
<p>From the rsyslog point of view, plugins constitute separate projects. As such,
we think plugins are not required to be compatible with GPLv3. However, this is
no legal advise. If you intend to release something under a non-GPLV3 compatible license
it is probably best to consult with your lawyer.
<p>Most importantly, and this is definite, the rsyslog team does not expect
or require you to contribute your plugin to the rsyslog project (but of course
we are happy if you do).
<h2>Copyright</h2>
<p>Copyright (c) 2009 <a href="http://www.gerhards.net/rainer">Rainer Gerhards</a>
and <a href="http://www.adiscon.com/en/">Adiscon</a>.</p>
<p>Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under
the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later
version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections,
no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license can be
viewed at <a href="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html">
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html</a>.</p>
</body>
</html>
|
