| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The DA850/OMAP-L138 is a new SoC from TI in the same family as
DA830/OMAP-L137.
Major changes include better support for power management,
support for SATA devices and McBSP (same IP as DM644x).
DA850/OMAP-L138 documents are available at
http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/omap-l138.html.
Signed-off-by: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar
to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci,
put the support for the da830 in the same directory as
the davinci code.
There are differences, however. Some of those differences
prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work
in the same kernel binary. Those differences are:
1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant
to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The
Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but
it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including
both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is
addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined
PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it
hasn't been accepted yet.
2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue
for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL
is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called
so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when
the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what
platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use
the correct uart address.
These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted
to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong.
A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added
to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and
the da830 architecture.
Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback
data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be
enabled when building a da830 kernel.
Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by
Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori.
Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com>
Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The patch adds base support for new TI SOC DM365, which s
similar to the dm355.
Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj <s-paulraj@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The current code to support the DaVinci Power and Sleep Controller (PSC)
assumes that there is only one controller. This assumption is no longer
valid so expand the support to allow greater than one PSC.
To accomplish this, put the base addresses for the PSCs in the SoC
infrastructure so it can be referenced by the PSC code. This also
requires adding an extra parameter to davinci_psc_config() to specify
the PSC that is to be enabled/disabled.
Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a significant rework of the low-level clock, PLL and Power
Sleep Controller (PSC) implementation for the DaVinci family. The
primary goal is to have better modeling if the hardware clocks and
features with the aim of DVFS functionality.
Highlights:
- model PLLs and all PLL-derived clocks
- model parent/child relationships of PLLs and clocks
- convert to new clkdev layer
- view clock frequency and refcount via /proc/davinci_clocks
Special thanks to significant contributions and testing by David
Brownell.
Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
|
|
|
This just leaves include/asm-arm/plat-* to deal with.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
