diff options
author | Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> | 2007-08-22 14:02:05 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org> | 2007-08-22 19:52:47 -0700 |
commit | b377fd3982ad957c796758a90e2988401a884241 (patch) | |
tree | 3d7449ccdf7038bffffa9323873f4095cc1ac6ce /include/linux | |
parent | 8e92f21ba3ea3f54e4be062b87ef9fc4af2d33e2 (diff) | |
download | kernel-crypto-b377fd3982ad957c796758a90e2988401a884241.tar.gz kernel-crypto-b377fd3982ad957c796758a90e2988401a884241.tar.xz kernel-crypto-b377fd3982ad957c796758a90e2988401a884241.zip |
Apply memory policies to top two highest zones when highest zone is ZONE_MOVABLE
The NUMA layer only supports NUMA policies for the highest zone. When
ZONE_MOVABLE is configured with kernelcore=, the the highest zone becomes
ZONE_MOVABLE. The result is that policies are only applied to allocations
like anonymous pages and page cache allocated from ZONE_MOVABLE when the
zone is used.
This patch applies policies to the two highest zones when the highest zone
is ZONE_MOVABLE. As ZONE_MOVABLE consists of pages from the highest "real"
zone, it's always functionally equivalent.
The patch has been tested on a variety of machines both NUMA and non-NUMA
covering x86, x86_64 and ppc64. No abnormal results were seen in
kernbench, tbench, dbench or hackbench. It passes regression tests from
the numactl package with and without kernelcore= once numactl tests are
patched to wait for vmstat counters to update.
akpm: this is the nasty hack to fix NUMA mempolicies in the presence of
ZONE_MOVABLE and kernelcore= in 2.6.23. Christoph says "For .24 either merge
the mobility or get the other solution that Mel is working on. That solution
would only use a single zonelist per node and filter on the fly. That may
help performance and also help to make memory policies work better."
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Acked-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Tested-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux')
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/mempolicy.h | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/mmzone.h | 18 |
2 files changed, 19 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/mempolicy.h b/include/linux/mempolicy.h index e147cf50529..5bdd656e88c 100644 --- a/include/linux/mempolicy.h +++ b/include/linux/mempolicy.h @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ extern enum zone_type policy_zone; static inline void check_highest_zone(enum zone_type k) { - if (k > policy_zone) + if (k > policy_zone && k != ZONE_MOVABLE) policy_zone = k; } diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h index 3ea68cd3b61..4e5627379b0 100644 --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h @@ -410,6 +410,24 @@ struct zonelist { #endif }; +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA +/* + * Only custom zonelists like MPOL_BIND need to be filtered as part of + * policies. As described in the comment for struct zonelist_cache, these + * zonelists will not have a zlcache so zlcache_ptr will not be set. Use + * that to determine if the zonelists needs to be filtered or not. + */ +static inline int alloc_should_filter_zonelist(struct zonelist *zonelist) +{ + return !zonelist->zlcache_ptr; +} +#else +static inline int alloc_should_filter_zonelist(struct zonelist *zonelist) +{ + return 0; +} +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */ + #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP struct node_active_region { unsigned long start_pfn; |