diff options
| author | Anoop C S <anoopcs@redhat.com> | 2017-07-15 20:54:06 +0530 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org> | 2017-07-27 09:54:58 +0200 |
| commit | ceb17676cba178f56d00d21189c3f1765e5c2ae0 (patch) | |
| tree | c9a627a4a7b54388d63477d089043790d753399e /example | |
| parent | 908834465e11736796e418dfdee6425f71959590 (diff) | |
| download | socket_wrapper-ceb17676cba178f56d00d21189c3f1765e5c2ae0.tar.gz socket_wrapper-ceb17676cba178f56d00d21189c3f1765e5c2ae0.tar.xz socket_wrapper-ceb17676cba178f56d00d21189c3f1765e5c2ae0.zip | |
swrap: Suppress intentional fall through warning
-Wimplicit-fallthrough compiler flag introduced with gcc v7
results in the following warning during compilation:
[ 7%] Building C object src/CMakeFiles/socket_wrapper.dir/socket_wrapper.c.o
src/socket_wrapper.c: In function ‘sockaddr_convert_to_un’:
src/socket_wrapper.c:1846:18: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
case AF_UNSPEC: {
^
/src/socket_wrapper.c:1866:2: note: here
case AF_INET:
^~~~
Default level for -Wimplicit-fallthrough(which is 3) allows
us to get rid of the above warning using specific comments
made within switch cases matching the regular expressions
outlined in gcc docs[1].
But for us the presence of preprocessor directives in the
vicinity of such comments nullifies its effect[2]. So our
best bet would be to make use of the reliable fallthrough
attribute and supress such warnings in future.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#index-Wimplicit-fallthrough
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77817
Signed-off-by: Anoop C S <anoopcs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'example')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
