add missing default_install tests to templates
ClosedPublic

Authored by garretraziel on Dec 16 2015, 12:49 PM.

Details

Summary

This adds missing default_install tests to templates - we've missed
KDE live and Server DVD on UEFI for some reason and Workstation netinst was
missing. After this, we should have all non-optional tests from "Default
boot and install" section covered.

Test Plan

Try to load templates. Hopefully, we will be able to test
reporting once we will have all images built - a lot of them are missing now
and I am unable to run tests on F23 RC10 (it is stuck on "Cheking for compose" forever).

Diff Detail

Repository
rOPENQATESTS os-autoinst-distri-fedora
Lint
Automatic diff as part of commit; lint not applicable.
Unit
Automatic diff as part of commit; unit tests not applicable.
garretraziel retitled this revision from to add missing default_install tests to templates.Dec 16 2015, 12:49 PM
garretraziel updated this object.
garretraziel edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)
garretraziel added reviewers: adamwill, jskladan.
adamwill added a comment.EditedDec 16 2015, 5:37 PM

So on the Workstation netinst - my understanding was it wasn't an official deliverable and the Workstation SIG didn't want to support it, but OTOH it's listed at https://getfedora.org/en/workstation/download/ , so I'm not sure what's going on there. Testing it can't hurt, I guess. I think some of the others were left out as a trade-off to try and preserve test resources, but we have more capacity now so hopefully adding them will be OK.

"I am unable to run tests on F23 RC10 (it is stuck on "Cheking for compose" forever)."

As you mentioned in D692 this needs adjusting for the changes made there.

That's because RC10 doesn't exist any more: check https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/ , it's been cleaned out. You could try running on F23 Final with just '--release 23', but it won't be able to submit the results to the wiki.

adamwill requested changes to this revision.Dec 16 2015, 5:38 PM
This revision now requires changes to proceed.Dec 16 2015, 5:38 PM

Yup, I was able to run those tests, but I wanted to try whether they will get reported, but oh well, there shouldn't (the s-word!) be any problems anyway.

merge with current develop

adamwill accepted this revision.Dec 19 2015, 5:57 AM

Sure, should be OK. I'll check whether the reporting stuff is all lined up next week, but with my recent change there's at least no chance it can break reporting of any *other* results.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Dec 19 2015, 5:57 AM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.