From b87501b9051a1befbd84165295b8ed775adafd62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robbie Harwood Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:20:49 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Build with -Werror-implicit-int where supported (cherry picked from commit 873d864230c9c64c65ff12a24199bac3adf3bc2f) --- src/aclocal.m4 | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/aclocal.m4 b/src/aclocal.m4 index 2bfb99496..da1d6d8b4 100644 --- a/src/aclocal.m4 +++ b/src/aclocal.m4 @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ if test "$GCC" = yes ; then TRY_WARN_CC_FLAG(-Wno-format-zero-length) # Other flags here may not be supported on some versions of # gcc that people want to use. - for flag in overflow strict-overflow missing-format-attribute missing-prototypes return-type missing-braces parentheses switch unused-function unused-label unused-variable unused-value unknown-pragmas sign-compare newline-eof error=uninitialized error=pointer-arith error=int-conversion error=incompatible-pointer-types error=discarded-qualifiers ; do + for flag in overflow strict-overflow missing-format-attribute missing-prototypes return-type missing-braces parentheses switch unused-function unused-label unused-variable unused-value unknown-pragmas sign-compare newline-eof error=uninitialized error=pointer-arith error=int-conversion error=incompatible-pointer-types error=discarded-qualifiers error=implicit-int ; do TRY_WARN_CC_FLAG(-W$flag) done # old-style-definition? generates many, many warnings