1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
|
From: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:26:46 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] dm cache: dirty flag was mistakenly being cleared when
promoting via overwrite
If the incoming bio is a WRITE and completely covers a block then we
don't bother to do any copying for a promotion operation. Once this is
done the cache block and origin block will be different, so we need to
set it to 'dirty'.
Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
index 6f7086355691..387b93d81138 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
@@ -951,10 +951,14 @@ static void migration_success_post_commit(struct dm_cache_migration *mg)
}
} else {
- clear_dirty(cache, mg->new_oblock, mg->cblock);
- if (mg->requeue_holder)
+ if (mg->requeue_holder) {
+ clear_dirty(cache, mg->new_oblock, mg->cblock);
cell_defer(cache, mg->new_ocell, true);
- else {
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * The block was promoted via an overwrite, so it's dirty.
+ */
+ set_dirty(cache, mg->new_oblock, mg->cblock);
bio_endio(mg->new_ocell->holder, 0);
cell_defer(cache, mg->new_ocell, false);
}
--
2.1.0
|
