1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
|
From 2ad01780bf59b3a785975bf48a066645e5b6f7f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 07:06:10 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 16/17] drm/i915/gen9: Reject display updates that exceed wm
limitations (v2)
If we can't find any valid level 0 watermark values for the requested
atomic transaction, reject the configuration before we try to start
programming the hardware.
v2:
- Add extra debugging output when we reject level 0 watermarks so that
we can more easily debug how/why they were rejected.
Cc: Lyude Paul <cpaul@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1463061971-19638-17-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index b072417..f764d28 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3306,7 +3306,22 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
if (res_blocks >= ddb_allocation || res_lines > 31) {
*enabled = false;
- return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * If there are no valid level 0 watermarks, then we can't
+ * support this display configuration.
+ */
+ if (level) {
+ return 0;
+ } else {
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Requested display configuration exceeds system watermark limitations\n");
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Plane %d.%d: blocks required = %u/%u, lines required = %u/31\n",
+ to_intel_crtc(cstate->base.crtc)->pipe,
+ skl_wm_plane_id(to_intel_plane(pstate->plane)),
+ res_blocks, ddb_allocation, res_lines);
+
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
}
*out_blocks = res_blocks;
--
2.7.4
|
