diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'swiotlb-silent-unwanted-warning-buffer-is-full.patch')
-rw-r--r-- | swiotlb-silent-unwanted-warning-buffer-is-full.patch | 43 |
1 files changed, 43 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/swiotlb-silent-unwanted-warning-buffer-is-full.patch b/swiotlb-silent-unwanted-warning-buffer-is-full.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000..353711008 --- /dev/null +++ b/swiotlb-silent-unwanted-warning-buffer-is-full.patch @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +From 05e13bb57e6f181d7605f8608181c7e6fb7f591d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> +Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 11:57:37 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH] swiotlb: silent unwanted warning "buffer is full" +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit + +If DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN is passed to swiotlb_alloc_buffer(), it should be +passed further down to swiotlb_tbl_map_single(). Otherwise we escape +half of the warnings but still log the other half. + +This is one of the multiple causes of spurious warnings reported at: +https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104082 + +Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> +Fixes: 0176adb00406 ("swiotlb: refactor coherent buffer allocation") +Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> +Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> +Cc: Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> +Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> +Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.16 +Signed-off-by: Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com> +--- + lib/swiotlb.c | 2 +- + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) + +diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c +index 12fbaa445637..cc640588f145 100644 +--- a/lib/swiotlb.c ++++ b/lib/swiotlb.c +@@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ swiotlb_alloc_buffer(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle, + + phys_addr = swiotlb_tbl_map_single(dev, + __phys_to_dma(dev, io_tlb_start), +- 0, size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE, 0); ++ 0, size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE, attrs); + if (phys_addr == SWIOTLB_MAP_ERROR) + goto out_warn; + +-- +2.17.0 + |