Linux v5.0.10

3 files changed, 5 insertions, 108 deletions

diff --git a/kernel.spec b/kernel.spec
index 37e0ed365..053009915 100644
--- a/kernel.spec
+++ b/kernel.spec
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ Summary: The Linux kernel
 %if 0%{?released_kernel}
 
 # Do we have a -stable update to apply?
-%define stable_update 9
+%define stable_update 10
 # Set rpm version accordingly
 %if 0%{?stable_update}
 %define stablerev %{stable_update}
@@ -603,9 +603,6 @@ Patch512: 0001-Revert-drm-i915-fbdev-Actually-configure-untiled-dis.patch
 # rhbz 1689750, patch submitted upstream
 Patch513: 0001-virt-vbox-Implement-passing-requestor-info-to-the-ho.patch
 
-# rhbz 1688283
-Patch514: v3-tpm-fix-an-invalid-condition-in-tpm_common_poll.patch
-
 # rhbz 1683382
 Patch515: nfsv4.1-avoid-false-retries.patch
 
@@ -1901,6 +1898,9 @@ fi
 #
 #
 %changelog
+* Mon Apr 29 2019 Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 5.0.10-200
+- Linux v5.0.10
+
 * Thu Apr 25 2019 Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>
 - Fix CVE-2019-3900 (rhbz 1698757 1702940)
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index e981227ba..a3219f3dc 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 SHA512 (linux-5.0.tar.xz) = 3fbab70c7b03b1a10e9fa14d1e2e1f550faba4f5792b7699ca006951da74ab86e7d7f19c6a67849ab99343186e7d6f2752cd910d76222213b93c1eab90abf1b0
-SHA512 (patch-5.0.9.xz) = 5f7ee13f7c5926ff4438f9c026a5a1dfd7301aedf445d2bb6eb4244ba0eb79586612e6f0353e1f45888d1978608ac4c7839e42d8f995c043f052f5801e53b9a6
+SHA512 (patch-5.0.10.xz) = 3e8d1a71b710a58436f7e437850c28d22e9df5de8a73d830e23261953dc563caf847695348589a061654ac18d60b5ccabe58afaf72fe5b018ed25fcaa63efd83
diff --git a/v3-tpm-fix-an-invalid-condition-in-tpm_common_poll.patch b/v3-tpm-fix-an-invalid-condition-in-tpm_common_poll.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 606373aa4..000000000
--- a/v3-tpm-fix-an-invalid-condition-in-tpm_common_poll.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,103 +0,0 @@
-From patchwork Thu Mar 21 23:02:12 2019
-Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
-MIME-Version: 1.0
-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
-X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>
-X-Patchwork-Id: 10864497
-Return-Path: <linux-integrity-owner@kernel.org>
-Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org
- [172.30.200.125])
-	by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711816C2
-	for <patchwork-linux-integrity@patchwork.kernel.org>;
- Thu, 21 Mar 2019 23:02:15 +0000 (UTC)
-Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
-	by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B312A4A8
-	for <patchwork-linux-integrity@patchwork.kernel.org>;
- Thu, 21 Mar 2019 23:02:15 +0000 (UTC)
-Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486)
-	id 4AA482A539; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 23:02:15 +0000 (UTC)
-X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
-	pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org
-X-Spam-Level: 
-X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
-	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
-Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
-	by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C399A2A4A8
-	for <patchwork-linux-integrity@patchwork.kernel.org>;
- Thu, 21 Mar 2019 23:02:14 +0000 (UTC)
-Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
-        id S1727157AbfCUXCO (ORCPT
-        <rfc822;patchwork-linux-integrity@patchwork.kernel.org>);
-        Thu, 21 Mar 2019 19:02:14 -0400
-Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:7149 "EHLO mga04.intel.com"
-        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
-        id S1727086AbfCUXCO (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>);
-        Thu, 21 Mar 2019 19:02:14 -0400
-X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
-X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
-Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38])
-  by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
- 21 Mar 2019 16:02:13 -0700
-X-ExtLoop1: 1
-X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,254,1549958400";
-   d="scan'208";a="284777192"
-Received: from jdemuth-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO
- tstruk-mobl1.jf.intel.com) ([10.251.150.110])
-  by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Mar 2019 16:02:13 -0700
-Subject: [PATCH v3] tpm: fix an invalid condition in tpm_common_poll
-From: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>
-To: jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com
-Cc: grawity@gmail.com, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
-        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
-        stable@vger.kernel.org, tadeusz.struk@intel.com
-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 16:02:12 -0700
-Message-ID: 
- <155320933278.5015.1752135965699928631.stgit@tstruk-mobl1.jf.intel.com>
-User-Agent: StGit/unknown-version
-MIME-Version: 1.0
-Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
-Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org
-Precedence: bulk
-List-ID: <linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org>
-X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
-X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
-
-The poll condition should only check response_length,
-because reads should only be issued if there is data to read.
-The response_read flag only prevents double writes.
-The problem was that the write set the response_read to false,
-enqued a tpm job, and returned. Then application called poll
-which checked the response_read flag and returned EPOLLIN.
-Then the application called read, but got nothing.
-After all that the async_work kicked in.
-Added also mutex_lock around the poll check to prevent
-other possible race conditions.
-
-Fixes: 9488585b21bef0df12 ("tpm: add support for partial reads")
-Reported-by: Mantas Mikulėnas <grawity@gmail.com>
-Tested-by: Mantas Mikulėnas <grawity@gmail.com>
-Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>
----
- drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c |    4 +++-
- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c
-index 5eecad233ea1..7312d3214381 100644
---- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c
-+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c
-@@ -203,12 +203,14 @@ __poll_t tpm_common_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
- 	__poll_t mask = 0;
- 
- 	poll_wait(file, &priv->async_wait, wait);
-+	mutex_lock(&priv->buffer_mutex);
- 
--	if (!priv->response_read || priv->response_length)
-+	if (priv->response_length)
- 		mask = EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
- 	else
- 		mask = EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM;
- 
-+	mutex_unlock(&priv->buffer_mutex);
- 	return mask;
- }
-