summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/0001-s390-jump_label-Correct-asm-contraint.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com>2019-05-22 17:41:29 +0000
committerJeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com>2019-06-03 16:40:33 +0000
commit36b34bfcbfc751e730bd8d87c4913824bdfdb320 (patch)
tree8a37da44ea39a60b6549ddb51789264178a05f90 /0001-s390-jump_label-Correct-asm-contraint.patch
parent3074ed2654b76680777291ee552ff1ee53dcc8f6 (diff)
downloadkernel-36b34bfcbfc751e730bd8d87c4913824bdfdb320.tar.gz
kernel-36b34bfcbfc751e730bd8d87c4913824bdfdb320.tar.xz
kernel-36b34bfcbfc751e730bd8d87c4913824bdfdb320.zip
Linux v5.1.6
Fix CVE-2019-12378 CVE-2019-3846 CVE-2019-12380 CVE-2019-12381 CVE-2019-12382 CVE-2019-12379
Diffstat (limited to '0001-s390-jump_label-Correct-asm-contraint.patch')
-rw-r--r--0001-s390-jump_label-Correct-asm-contraint.patch63
1 files changed, 63 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/0001-s390-jump_label-Correct-asm-contraint.patch b/0001-s390-jump_label-Correct-asm-contraint.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..631fea919
--- /dev/null
+++ b/0001-s390-jump_label-Correct-asm-contraint.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+From b0b46a5b622fdbe69207675c5d50b77cb8ae43b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
+Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 13:43:49 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH] s390/jump_label: Correct asm contraint
+
+On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 08:25:58AM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
+> On 1/23/19 5:24 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
+> >On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 01:55:13PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
+> >>There's a build failure with gcc9:
+> >>
+> >> ./arch/s390/include/asm/jump_label.h: Assembler messages:
+> >> ./arch/s390/include/asm/jump_label.h:23: Error: bad expression
+> >> ./arch/s390/include/asm/jump_label.h:23: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `r'
+> >> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:277: init/main.o] Error 1
+...
+> I've had to turn off s390 in Fedora until this gets fixed :(
+
+Laura, the patch below should fix this (temporarily). If possible,
+could you give it a try? It seems to work for me.
+
+rom 4067027c2ccc8d3f1dc3bb19fe2d00da0c65bcd8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
+Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 13:21:56 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH] s390: disable section anchors
+
+Disable section anchors to allow to compile with the current gcc 9
+experimental version. The section anchors is a new feature for s390
+with gcc 9, however it breaks our current usage of the 'X' constraint
+within the asm goto construct within our jump label implementation.
+
+Fixing this seems to be non-trivial, therefore (hopefully) temporarily
+disable section anchors. We will hopefully have a better solution
+before gcc 9 is released, so that this can be removed again.
+
+Reported-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
+Suggested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
+Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
+---
+ arch/s390/Makefile | 8 ++++++++
+ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
+
+diff --git a/arch/s390/Makefile b/arch/s390/Makefile
+index e21053e5e0da..1eac75bc3a29 100644
+--- a/arch/s390/Makefile
++++ b/arch/s390/Makefile
+@@ -62,6 +62,14 @@ cflags-y += -Wa,-I$(srctree)/arch/$(ARCH)/include
+ #
+ cflags-$(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER) += -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
+
++#
++# Disable section anchors. This gcc 9 feature currently breaks the 'X'
++# constraint like it is used in the asm goto construct.
++#
++ifeq ($(call cc-option-yn,-fno-section-anchors),y)
++cflags-y += -fno-section-anchors
++endif
++
+ ifeq ($(call cc-option-yn,-mpacked-stack),y)
+ cflags-$(CONFIG_PACK_STACK) += -mpacked-stack -D__PACK_STACK
+ aflags-$(CONFIG_PACK_STACK) += -D__PACK_STACK
+--
+2.20.1
+