From 5aa987f2edc5c60b61d66fc0e5b7e0fb33423586 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:22:21 +0200
Subject: PR10739 testcase. Split const_value test in two. Absolute const addr
 fails.

* testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value.exp: Handle both const_value blocks
  and address separately. XFAIL second test as PR10739.
* testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value.stp: Only query baz const value.
* testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value_func.c: New test for bar address.
* testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value_func.stp: Likewise.
---
 testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value_func.stp | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value_func.stp

(limited to 'testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value_func.stp')

diff --git a/testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value_func.stp b/testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value_func.stp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..9dad9150
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value_func.stp
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+probe process("const_value_func.exe").mark("constvalues")
+{
+  printf("f: %s\n", usymname($f));
+}
\ No newline at end of file
-- 
cgit