From 5aa987f2edc5c60b61d66fc0e5b7e0fb33423586 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:22:21 +0200
Subject: PR10739 testcase. Split const_value test in two. Absolute const addr
 fails.

* testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value.exp: Handle both const_value blocks
  and address separately. XFAIL second test as PR10739.
* testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value.stp: Only query baz const value.
* testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value_func.c: New test for bar address.
* testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value_func.stp: Likewise.
---
 testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value_func.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value_func.c

(limited to 'testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value_func.c')

diff --git a/testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value_func.c b/testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value_func.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..23f2f0bc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value_func.c
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+#include "sdt.h"
+
+static int
+bar (int i, long j)
+{
+  return i * j;
+}
+
+static int
+func (int (*f) ())
+{
+  volatile int i = 2;
+  volatile long j = 21;
+  STAP_PROBE (test, constvalues);
+  return f(i, j);
+}
+
+int
+main (int argc, char *argv[], char *envp[])
+{
+  return func (&bar) - 42;
+}
-- 
cgit