From 5aa987f2edc5c60b61d66fc0e5b7e0fb33423586 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Wielaard Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:22:21 +0200 Subject: PR10739 testcase. Split const_value test in two. Absolute const addr fails. * testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value.exp: Handle both const_value blocks and address separately. XFAIL second test as PR10739. * testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value.stp: Only query baz const value. * testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value_func.c: New test for bar address. * testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value_func.stp: Likewise. --- testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value.stp | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value.stp') diff --git a/testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value.stp b/testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value.stp index 109d3d46..7aded0f2 100644 --- a/testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value.stp +++ b/testsuite/systemtap.base/const_value.stp @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ probe process("const_value.exe").mark("constvalues") { - printf("f: %s\n", usymname($f)); printf("i: %d\n", $baz->i); printf("j: %d\n", $baz->j); } \ No newline at end of file -- cgit