From a6f6008cf0034b8580f67851f742dd0ada0d683c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 13:08:06 +0200
Subject: Prefer dwarf unwinder on i386 and x86_64.

* runtime/runtime.h: Move up and enable check for STP_USE_DWARF_UNWINDER.
---
 runtime/runtime.h | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

(limited to 'runtime/runtime.h')

diff --git a/runtime/runtime.h b/runtime/runtime.h
index 0a656b78..f333756e 100644
--- a/runtime/runtime.h
+++ b/runtime/runtime.h
@@ -66,6 +66,11 @@ static struct
 #define MAXTRACE 20
 #endif
 
+/* dwarf unwinder only tested so far on i386 and x86_64. */
+#if (defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__))
+#define STP_USE_DWARF_UNWINDER
+#endif
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
 /* Just because frame pointers are available does not mean we can trust them. */
 #ifndef STP_USE_DWARF_UNWINDER
@@ -73,13 +78,6 @@ static struct
 #endif
 #endif
 
-/* dwarf unwinder only tested so far on i386 and x86_64,
-   but globally disabled for now */
-#if 0
-// !defined(STP_USE_FRAME_BUFFER) && (defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__))
-#define STP_USE_DWARF_UNWINDER
-#endif
-
 #include "alloc.c"
 #include "print.c"
 #include "string.c"
-- 
cgit