From 5ff4b74df3f32192c9828233295d9f8fedcceb23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Metzmacher Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:52:14 +0000 Subject: r15656: for NT IOCTL's we need to control the max_data field for some calls metze (This used to be commit 3cab02f6f513cf7eb3d8863e62952766bb4d908f) --- source4/torture/raw/ioctl.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'source4/torture/raw/ioctl.c') diff --git a/source4/torture/raw/ioctl.c b/source4/torture/raw/ioctl.c index cd930475761..dd100e107d1 100644 --- a/source4/torture/raw/ioctl.c +++ b/source4/torture/raw/ioctl.c @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ static BOOL test_fsctl(struct smbcli_state *cli, TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx) nt.ntioctl.in.file.fnum = fnum; nt.ntioctl.in.fsctl = True; nt.ntioctl.in.filter = 0; + nt.ntioctl.in.max_data = 0; nt.ntioctl.in.blob = data_blob(NULL, 0); status = smb_raw_ioctl(cli->tree, mem_ctx, &nt); @@ -112,10 +113,11 @@ static BOOL test_fsctl(struct smbcli_state *cli, TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx) printf("trying batch oplock\n"); nt.ioctl.level = RAW_IOCTL_NTIOCTL; - nt.ntioctl.in.function = (FSCTL_FILESYSTEM | (2<<2)); + nt.ntioctl.in.function = FSCTL_REQUEST_BATCH_OPLOCK; nt.ntioctl.in.file.fnum = fnum; nt.ntioctl.in.fsctl = True; nt.ntioctl.in.filter = 0; + nt.ntioctl.in.max_data = 0; nt.ntioctl.in.blob = data_blob(NULL, 0); status = smb_raw_ioctl(cli->tree, mem_ctx, &nt); -- cgit