samba.git - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	s3-talloc Change TALLOC_ZERO_P() to talloc_zero()	Andrew Bartlett	2011-06-09	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \|	Using the standard macro makes it easier to move code into common, as TALLOC_ZERO_P isn't standard talloc.
*	s3-build: use dbwrap.h only where needed.	Günther Deschner	2010-08-26	1	-0/+1
\| \| \| \|	Guenther
*	Implement db_rbt_traverse	Volker Lendecke	2009-08-08	1	-4/+33
\|
*	s3: Fix a memleak in dbwrap_rbt.	Michael Adam	2009-03-04	1	-4/+4
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	The SMB_MALLOC'ed rbt node data was not free'd on talloc free of the db context. This is a quick fix using talloc instead of malloc for allocation of the node data. Since malloc was originally used for performance reasons, one might want to reverse to malloc and create a talloc destructor that walks the tree and frees all the node data if this talloc approach proves to be too slow.. Michael
*	Move rbtree.[ch] to lib/util.	Jelmer Vernooij	2008-10-12	1	-1/+1
\|
*	Fix the build on FreeBSD 4.6.2	Volker Lendecke	2008-06-19	1	-4/+5
\| \| \| \|	(This used to be commit 4f50cb63e9b565ae0747127baa651a1a1874298b)
*	Add transactions to the dbwrap API	Volker Lendecke	2008-03-10	1	-0/+11
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Only filled in for tdb so far, for rbt it's pointless, and ctdb itself needs to be extended (This used to be commit 0a55e018dd68af06d84332d54148bbfb0b510b22)
*	Restructure dbwrap_rbt	Volker Lendecke	2008-01-12	1	-59/+127
\| \| \| \| \| \| \|	In this low-level code, play tricks to reduce the number of allocations to the possible minimum. I would not recommend this for higher-level code, but here it pays off. (This used to be commit 71b1e6ff1595fbaa8dd49b996c45541531c7e98c)
*	Samba Shared Repository - branch v3-2-test updated - ↵	Volker Lendecke	2007-12-19	1	-10/+8
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	initial-v3-2-unstable-716-g12cce3b On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 06:04:32PM -0600, Jeremy Allison wrote: > Fix valgrind error in dbwrap_rbt where rec_priv->node was > being accessed after free. VALOKER PLEASE CHECK THIS VERY > CAREFULLY !!!! This is a correct fix in that it fixes the > valgrind error, but it looks inelegant to me. I think if > I understood this code better I could craft a more subtle > fix. Still looking at it.... Thanks a lot. Fully correct. What about the attached little simplification? Volker (This used to be commit 5b72828600fb057a7aeb5f1a6fb6c23c23f28cd8)
*	We've finished with the old node once we've copied the	Jeremy Allison	2007-12-18	1	-4/+4
\| \| \| \| \| \|	keyval. Jeremy. (This used to be commit 39f3efbcc5fbdff1db1b12e5fc7368968f240993)
*	Fix valgrind error in dbwrap_rbt where rec_priv->node was	Jeremy Allison	2007-12-18	1	-1/+10
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	being accessed after free. VALOKER PLEASE CHECK THIS VERY CAREFULLY !!!! This is a correct fix in that it fixes the valgrind error, but it looks inelegant to me. I think if I understood this code better I could craft a more subtle fix. Still looking at it.... Jeremy. (This used to be commit 12cce3be2a24fd72106d747890caf6c7f29db43d)
*	dbwrap_rbt	Volker Lendecke	2007-12-10	1	-0/+303
	This is meant as a replacement for the internal tdb. To me it seems a bit silly that for in-memory structures we do our own memory management. With this rbt based approach we can make use of the system-supplied malloc. (This used to be commit 54e5d4404619443caed32e2acff8921cdbff9ed1)