Given how core this code is, I figure it should have it's own testsuite.

Big thanks to tpot and mbp for showing how easy it can be to write a simple
unit test, and for providing the STF.

This also changes the strstr_m() code to use strstr_w() (avoiding
duplication) and fixes it so that it passes the STF.

(We now always restart before doing the unicode run, until sombody can
show me why the testsuite is wrong).

Andrew Bartlett
(This used to be commit a893a324f37e6a171719db8ffffe66df31c2dbaa)

1 files changed, 35 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/source3/torture/t_strstr.c b/source3/torture/t_strstr.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..25709526fe8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/source3/torture/t_strstr.c
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2003 by Martin Pool
+ *
+ * Test harness for strstr_m
+ */
+
+#include "includes.h"
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+	int i;
+	int iters = 1;
+	
+	char *ret;
+
+	/* Needed to initialize character set */
+	lp_load("/dev/null", True, False, False);
+
+	if (argc < 3) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s STRING1 STRING2 [ITERS]\n"
+			"Compares two strings, prints the results of strstr_m\n",
+			argv[0]);
+		return 2;
+	}
+	if (argc >= 4)
+		iters = atoi(argv[3]);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < iters; i++) {
+		ret = strstr_m(argv[1], argv[2]);
+	}
+
+	printf("%s\n", ret);
+	
+	return 0;
+}