diff options
| author | Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org> | 2003-07-01 22:58:52 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org> | 2003-07-01 22:58:52 +0000 |
| commit | cc02d3bc170fe5c8c4474156edb6c83720a47aa0 (patch) | |
| tree | d2a1327dcb77a2c520a336579894e1868019dffc /docs/htmldocs/securing-samba.html | |
| parent | c6de5df01d470c2dab48cdd6298f450fa94f9a8e (diff) | |
| download | samba-cc02d3bc170fe5c8c4474156edb6c83720a47aa0.tar.gz samba-cc02d3bc170fe5c8c4474156edb6c83720a47aa0.tar.xz samba-cc02d3bc170fe5c8c4474156edb6c83720a47aa0.zip | |
regenerate docs
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/htmldocs/securing-samba.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/htmldocs/securing-samba.html | 49 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/docs/htmldocs/securing-samba.html b/docs/htmldocs/securing-samba.html index 621ef87cf58..a790816d021 100644 --- a/docs/htmldocs/securing-samba.html +++ b/docs/htmldocs/securing-samba.html @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ -<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> -<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"><title>Chapter 15. Securing Samba</title><link rel="stylesheet" href="samba.css" type="text/css"><meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets V1.60.1"><link rel="home" href="index.html" title="SAMBA Project Documentation"><link rel="up" href="optional.html" title="Part III. Advanced Configuration"><link rel="previous" href="locking.html" title="Chapter 14. File and Record Locking"><link rel="next" href="InterdomainTrusts.html" title="Chapter 16. Interdomain Trust Relationships"></head><body bgcolor="white" text="black" link="#0000FF" vlink="#840084" alink="#0000FF"><div class="navheader"><table width="100%" summary="Navigation header"><tr><th colspan="3" align="center">Chapter 15. Securing Samba</th></tr><tr><td width="20%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="locking.html">Prev</a> </td><th width="60%" align="center">Part III. Advanced Configuration</th><td width="20%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="InterdomainTrusts.html">Next</a></td></tr></table><hr></div><div class="chapter" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title"><a name="securing-samba"></a>Chapter 15. Securing Samba</h2></div><div><div class="author"><h3 class="author"><span class="firstname">Andrew</span> <span class="surname">Tridgell</span></h3><div class="affiliation"><span class="orgname">Samba Team<br></span><div class="address"><p><tt class="email"><<a href="mailto:tridge@samba.org">tridge@samba.org</a>></tt></p></div></div></div></div><div><div class="author"><h3 class="author"><span class="firstname">John</span> <span class="othername">H.</span> <span class="surname">Terpstra</span></h3><div class="affiliation"><span class="orgname">Samba Team<br></span><div class="address"><p><tt class="email"><<a href="mailto:jht@samba.org">jht@samba.org</a>></tt></p></div></div></div></div><div><p class="pubdate">May 26, 2003</p></div></div><div></div></div><div class="toc"><p><b>Table of Contents</b></p><dl><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2929518">Introduction</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2929550">Features and Benefits</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928211">Technical Discussion of Protective Measures and Issues</a></dt><dd><dl><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928229">Using host based protection</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928297">User based protection</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928349">Using interface protection</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928399">Using a firewall</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928455">Using a IPC$ share deny</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928521">NTLMv2 Security</a></dt></dl></dd><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928559">Upgrading Samba</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928583">Common Errors</a></dt><dd><dl><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928602">Smbclient works on localhost, but the network is dead</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2928626">Why can users access home directories of other users?</a></dt></dl></dd></dl></div><div class="sect1" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both"><a name="id2929518"></a>Introduction</h2></div></div><div></div></div><p> +<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"><title>Chapter 15. Securing Samba</title><link rel="stylesheet" href="samba.css" type="text/css"><meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets V1.60.1"><link rel="home" href="index.html" title="SAMBA Project Documentation"><link rel="up" href="optional.html" title="Part III. Advanced Configuration"><link rel="previous" href="locking.html" title="Chapter 14. File and Record Locking"><link rel="next" href="InterdomainTrusts.html" title="Chapter 16. Interdomain Trust Relationships"></head><body bgcolor="white" text="black" link="#0000FF" vlink="#840084" alink="#0000FF"><div class="navheader"><table width="100%" summary="Navigation header"><tr><th colspan="3" align="center">Chapter 15. Securing Samba</th></tr><tr><td width="20%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="locking.html">Prev</a> </td><th width="60%" align="center">Part III. Advanced Configuration</th><td width="20%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="InterdomainTrusts.html">Next</a></td></tr></table><hr></div><div class="chapter" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title"><a name="securing-samba"></a>Chapter 15. Securing Samba</h2></div><div><div class="author"><h3 class="author"><span class="firstname">Andrew</span> <span class="surname">Tridgell</span></h3><div class="affiliation"><span class="orgname">Samba Team<br></span><div class="address"><p><tt class="email"><<a href="mailto:tridge@samba.org">tridge@samba.org</a>></tt></p></div></div></div></div><div><div class="author"><h3 class="author"><span class="firstname">John</span> <span class="othername">H.</span> <span class="surname">Terpstra</span></h3><div class="affiliation"><span class="orgname">Samba Team<br></span><div class="address"><p><tt class="email"><<a href="mailto:jht@samba.org">jht@samba.org</a>></tt></p></div></div></div></div><div><p class="pubdate">May 26, 2003</p></div></div><div></div></div><div class="toc"><p><b>Table of Contents</b></p><dl><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2931943">Introduction</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2931976">Features and Benefits</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2932050">Technical Discussion of Protective Measures and Issues</a></dt><dd><dl><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2932069">Using host based protection</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2932140">User based protection</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2932191">Using interface protection</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2932244">Using a firewall</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2932300">Using a IPC$ share deny</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2932362">NTLMv2 Security</a></dt></dl></dd><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2932402">Upgrading Samba</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2932426">Common Errors</a></dt><dd><dl><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2932444">Smbclient works on localhost, but the network is dead</a></dt><dt><a href="securing-samba.html#id2932469">Why can users access home directories of other users?</a></dt></dl></dd></dl></div><div class="sect1" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both"><a name="id2931943"></a>Introduction</h2></div></div><div></div></div><p> This note was attached to the Samba 2.2.8 release notes as it contained an important security fix. The information contained here applies to Samba installations in general. @@ -11,7 +10,7 @@ on it!" Security concerns are just like that: You need to know a little about the subject to appreciate how obvious most of it really is. The challenge for most of us is to discover that first morsel of knowledge with which we may unlock the secrets of the masters. -</p></div><div class="sect1" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both"><a name="id2929550"></a>Features and Benefits</h2></div></div><div></div></div><p> +</p></div><div class="sect1" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both"><a name="id2931976"></a>Features and Benefits</h2></div></div><div></div></div><p> There are three level at which security principals must be observed in order to render a site at least moderately secure. These are: the perimeter firewall, the configuration of the host server that is running Samba, and Samba itself. @@ -30,13 +29,13 @@ TCP/IP connections. Another method by which Samba may be secured is by way of setting Access Control Entries in an Access Control List on the shares themselves. This is discussed in the chapter on File, Directory and Share Access Control. -</p></div><div class="sect1" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both"><a name="id2928211"></a>Technical Discussion of Protective Measures and Issues</h2></div></div><div></div></div><p> +</p></div><div class="sect1" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both"><a name="id2932050"></a>Technical Discussion of Protective Measures and Issues</h2></div></div><div></div></div><p> The key challenge of security is the fact that protective measures suffice at best only to close the door on known exploits and breach techniques. Never assume that because you have followed these few measures that the Samba server is now an impenetrable fortress! Given the history of information systems so far, it is only a matter of time before someone will find yet another vulnerability. -</p><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2928229"></a>Using host based protection</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p> +</p><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2932069"></a>Using host based protection</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p> In many installations of Samba the greatest threat comes for outside your immediate network. By default Samba will accept connections from any host, which means that if you run an insecure version of Samba on @@ -56,7 +55,7 @@ before someone will find yet another vulnerability. 192.168.3. All other connections will be refused as soon as the client sends its first packet. The refusal will be marked as a <span class="errorname">not listening on called name</span> error. - </p></div><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2928297"></a>User based protection</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p> + </p></div><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2932140"></a>User based protection</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p> If you want to restrict access to your server to valid users only then the following method may be of use. In the <tt class="filename">smb.conf</tt> <i class="parameter"><tt>[globals]</tt></i> section put: </p><pre class="programlisting"> @@ -64,7 +63,7 @@ before someone will find yet another vulnerability. </pre><p> What this does is, it restricts all server access to either the user <span class="emphasis"><em>jacko</em></span> or to members of the system group <span class="emphasis"><em>smbusers</em></span>. - </p></div><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2928349"></a>Using interface protection</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p> + </p></div><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2932191"></a>Using interface protection</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p> By default Samba will accept connections on any network interface that it finds on your system. That means if you have a ISDN line or a PPP connection to the Internet then Samba will accept connections on those @@ -86,7 +85,7 @@ before someone will find yet another vulnerability. connection refused reply. In that case no Samba code is run at all as the operating system has been told not to pass connections from that interface to any samba process. - </p></div><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2928399"></a>Using a firewall</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p> + </p></div><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2932244"></a>Using a firewall</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p> Many people use a firewall to deny access to services that they don't want exposed outside their network. This can be a very good idea, although I would recommend using it in conjunction with the above @@ -99,7 +98,7 @@ before someone will find yet another vulnerability. The last one is important as many older firewall setups may not be aware of it, given that this port was only added to the protocol in recent years. - </p></div><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2928455"></a>Using a IPC$ share deny</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p> + </p></div><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2932300"></a>Using a IPC$ share deny</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p> If the above methods are not suitable, then you could also place a more specific deny on the IPC$ share that is used in the recently discovered security hole. This allows you to offer access to other @@ -126,10 +125,10 @@ before someone will find yet another vulnerability. </p><p> This is not recommended unless you cannot use one of the other methods listed above for some reason. - </p></div><div xmlns:ns41="" class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2928521"></a>NTLMv2 Security</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p> + </p></div><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2932362"></a>NTLMv2 Security</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p> To configure NTLMv2 authentication the following registry keys are worth knowing about: - </p><ns41:p> - </ns41:p><pre class="screen"> + </p><p> + </p><pre class="screen"> [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa] "lmcompatibilitylevel"=dword:00000003 @@ -143,25 +142,25 @@ before someone will find yet another vulnerability. 0x80000 - NTLMv2 session security. If either NtlmMinClientSec or NtlmMinServerSec is set to 0x80000, the connection will fail if NTLMv2 session security is not negotiated. - </pre><ns41:p> - </ns41:p></div></div><div class="sect1" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both"><a name="id2928559"></a>Upgrading Samba</h2></div></div><div></div></div><p> + </pre><p> + </p></div></div><div class="sect1" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both"><a name="id2932402"></a>Upgrading Samba</h2></div></div><div></div></div><p> Please check regularly on <a href="http://www.samba.org/" target="_top">http://www.samba.org/</a> for updates and important announcements. Occasionally security releases are made and it is highly recommended to upgrade Samba when a security vulnerability is discovered. -</p></div><div class="sect1" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both"><a name="id2928583"></a>Common Errors</h2></div></div><div></div></div><p> +</p></div><div class="sect1" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both"><a name="id2932426"></a>Common Errors</h2></div></div><div></div></div><p> If all of samba and host platform configuration were really as intuitive as one might like then this section would not be necessary. Security issues are often vexing for a support person to resolve, not -because of the complexity of the problem, but for reason that most admininstrators who post what turns +because of the complexity of the problem, but for reason that most administrators who post what turns out to be a security problem request are totally convinced that the problem is with Samba. -</p><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2928602"></a>Smbclient works on localhost, but the network is dead</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p> +</p><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2932444"></a>Smbclient works on localhost, but the network is dead</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p> This is a very common problem. Red Hat Linux (as do others) will install a default firewall. With the default firewall in place only traffic on the loopback adapter (IP address 127.0.0.1) will be allowed through the firewall. </p><p> The solution is either to remove the firewall (stop it) or to modify the firewall script to allow SMB networking traffic through. See section above in this chapter. - </p></div><div xmlns:ns42="" class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2928626"></a>Why can users access home directories of other users?</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p> + </p></div><div class="sect2" lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a name="id2932469"></a>Why can users access home directories of other users?</h3></div></div><div></div></div><p> “<span class="quote"> We are unable to keep individual users from mapping to any other user's home directory once they have supplied a valid password! They only need @@ -171,7 +170,7 @@ out to be a security problem request are totally convinced that the problem is w </span>” </p><p>“<span class="quote"> User xyzzy can map his home directory. Once mapped user xyzzy can also map - *anyone* elses home directory! + *anyone* else's home directory! </span>”</p><p> This is not a security flaw, it is by design. Samba allows users to have *exactly* the same access to the UNIX filesystem @@ -192,16 +191,16 @@ out to be a security problem request are totally convinced that the problem is w Samba does allow the setup you require when you have set the <i class="parameter"><tt>only user = yes</tt></i> option on the share, is that you have not set the valid users list for the share. - </p><ns42:p> + </p><p> Note that only user works in conjunction with the users= list, so to get the behavior you require, add the line : - </ns42:p><pre class="programlisting"> + </p><pre class="programlisting"> users = %S - </pre><ns42:p> + </pre><p> this is equivalent to: - </ns42:p><pre class="programlisting"> + </p><pre class="programlisting"> valid users = %S - </pre><ns42:p> + </pre><p> to the definition of the <i class="parameter"><tt>[homes]</tt></i> share, as recommended in the <tt class="filename">smb.conf</tt> man page. - </ns42:p></div></div></div><div class="navfooter"><hr><table width="100%" summary="Navigation footer"><tr><td width="40%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="locking.html">Prev</a> </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="u" href="optional.html">Up</a></td><td width="40%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="InterdomainTrusts.html">Next</a></td></tr><tr><td width="40%" align="left" valign="top">Chapter 14. File and Record Locking </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="h" href="index.html">Home</a></td><td width="40%" align="right" valign="top"> Chapter 16. Interdomain Trust Relationships</td></tr></table></div></body></html> + </p></div></div></div><div class="navfooter"><hr><table width="100%" summary="Navigation footer"><tr><td width="40%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="locking.html">Prev</a> </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="u" href="optional.html">Up</a></td><td width="40%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="InterdomainTrusts.html">Next</a></td></tr><tr><td width="40%" align="left" valign="top">Chapter 14. File and Record Locking </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="h" href="index.html">Home</a></td><td width="40%" align="right" valign="top"> Chapter 16. Interdomain Trust Relationships</td></tr></table></div></body></html> |