| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug #10118 - Samba is chatty about being unable to open a printer
Reviewed-by: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 11 03:10:08 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 11 01:21:00 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
execute aways"
3.6 and earlier allowed open for execution when execute permissions are
not present on a file. This has been fixed in Samba 4.0.
This patch changes smbd to skip the execute bit from the ACL check
in the open code if "acl allow execute always = yes", hence
re-establishing the old behaviour in this case.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When a Windows client receives a large directory listing while
querying snapshots, it sends a find request asking for the
timestamp as a directory. A Windows server returns NO_SUCH_FILE,
so make sure Samba returns the same. Otherwise the client will
get confused and display timestamps in the 'previous versions' dialog.
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Sep 10 22:38:51 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instead of using list_sessions(), use find_sessions() that
builds the list of only the sessions of interest.
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
this routine builds a list of sessions from a
particular remote machine or user.
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
added capability to filter sessions based on remote
machine name and user name.
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Sep 10 15:35:20 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There is not default so you should always have to specify a directory in
the config file.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cleanup leftover include and linking of libldb-cmdline in
oLschema2ldif. Do not build libldb-cmdline anymore when using the
system ldb, oLschema2ldif was the only reason for building
libldb-cmdline.
Signed-off-by: Jeroen Dekkers <jeroen@dekkers.ch>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Sep 10 12:52:26 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Sep 9 17:02:28 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Sep 8 13:39:25 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Requires new talloc
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is necessary to allow talloc pools to be objects on their own. It
is an incompatible change in the sense that talloc_get_size(pool) now
returns 0 instead of the pool size. When the talloc_pooled_object()
call is added, this will start to make sense again.
Maybe we should add a talloc_pool_size call? Or is that overkill?
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a preparation to make talloc pool real objects themselves.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This will allow to exchange the extra talloc pool header with the
talloc_chunk structure
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If we want nested pools, we will have pools that are pool members. So
we will have to have a separate "next object" pointer for pools. As
we have struct talloc_pool_chunk now, this additional pointer does not
affect normal talloc objects.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
changing smb server version from 4.9 to 6.1 to
mimic win2k8r2.
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 6 19:41:51 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 6 15:29:55 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't have lck allocated yet at these points. Remove the TALLOC_FREE
calls that triggered me looking for the get_share_mode_lock calls.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There's no point checking the validity of the "entry" argument more
than once
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This flag existed to break an exclusive or batch oplock in just one
instead of two steps down to "no oplock" when we did an allocation or file
size change. Running raw.oplock against W2k12 differs in this respect
from W2k3: W2k12 takes two steps (via level2) to break to none. This
removes the special flag that we only had for compatibility with systems
older than W2k12...
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 6 00:47:07 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
W2k12 seems to do the 2-step break to none, try running raw.oplock.batch12
against it.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This needs doing even if we don't have strct allocate set. The client
should not know that we lied. Fixes smb2.oplock.batch12.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Sep 5 20:09:21 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|