From d12b9e0c67cc72c9b1631bf2a5611d383e7ad69d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rainer Gerhards Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:03:14 +0200 Subject: some memory accesses are now explicitely atomic ... as far as I think this mostly is to keep the thread debuggers happy --- runtime/wti.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) (limited to 'runtime/wti.c') diff --git a/runtime/wti.c b/runtime/wti.c index f20812f8..9de7c365 100644 --- a/runtime/wti.c +++ b/runtime/wti.c @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ #include "wti.h" #include "obj.h" #include "glbl.h" +#include "atomic.h" /* static data */ DEFobjStaticHelpers @@ -106,6 +107,7 @@ rsRetVal wtiSetState(wti_t *pThis, qWrkCmd_t tCmd, int bActiveOnly, int bLockMutex) { DEFiRet; + qWrkCmd_t tCurrCmd; DEFVARS_mutexProtection; ISOBJ_TYPE_assert(pThis, wti); @@ -113,13 +115,14 @@ wtiSetState(wti_t *pThis, qWrkCmd_t tCmd, int bActiveOnly, int bLockMutex) BEGIN_MTX_PROTECTED_OPERATIONS(&pThis->mut, bLockMutex); + tCurrCmd = pThis->tCurrCmd; /* all worker states must be followed sequentially, only termination can be set in any state */ - if( (bActiveOnly && (pThis->tCurrCmd < eWRKTHRD_RUN_CREATED)) - || (pThis->tCurrCmd > tCmd && !(tCmd == eWRKTHRD_TERMINATING || tCmd == eWRKTHRD_STOPPED))) { - dbgprintf("%s: command %d can not be accepted in current %d processing state - ignored\n", - wtiGetDbgHdr(pThis), tCmd, pThis->tCurrCmd); + if( (bActiveOnly && (tCurrCmd < eWRKTHRD_RUN_CREATED)) + || (tCurrCmd > tCmd && !(tCmd == eWRKTHRD_TERMINATING || tCmd == eWRKTHRD_STOPPED))) { + DBGPRINTF("%s: command %d can not be accepted in current %d processing state - ignored\n", + wtiGetDbgHdr(pThis), tCmd, tCurrCmd); } else { - dbgprintf("%s: receiving command %d\n", wtiGetDbgHdr(pThis), tCmd); + DBGPRINTF("%s: receiving command %d\n", wtiGetDbgHdr(pThis), tCmd); /* we could replace this with a simple if, but we leave the switch in in case we need * to add something at a later stage. -- rgerhards, 2008-09-30 */ @@ -143,7 +146,12 @@ wtiSetState(wti_t *pThis, qWrkCmd_t tCmd, int bActiveOnly, int bLockMutex) /* DO NOTHING */ break; } - pThis->tCurrCmd = tCmd; /* apply the new state */ + /* apply the new state */ + unsigned val = ATOMIC_CAS_VAL(pThis->tCurrCmd, tCurrCmd, tCmd); + if(val != tCurrCmd) { + DBGPRINTF("wtiSetState PROBLEM, tCurrCmd %d overwritten with %d, wanted to set %d\n", tCurrCmd, val, tCmd); + } + } END_MTX_PROTECTED_OPERATIONS(&pThis->mut); @@ -169,7 +177,7 @@ wtiCancelThrd(wti_t *pThis) dbgoprint((obj_t*) pThis, "canceling worker thread\n"); pthread_cancel(pThis->thrdID); wtiSetState(pThis, eWRKTHRD_TERMINATING, 0, MUTEX_ALREADY_LOCKED); - pThis->pWtp->bThrdStateChanged = 1; /* indicate change, so harverster will be called */ + ATOMIC_STORE_1_TO_INT(pThis->pWtp->bThrdStateChanged); /* indicate change, so harverster will be called */ } d_pthread_mutex_unlock(&pThis->mut); @@ -318,7 +326,7 @@ wtiWorkerCancelCleanup(void *arg) d_pthread_mutex_lock(&pWtp->mut); wtiSetState(pThis, eWRKTHRD_TERMINATING, 0, MUTEX_ALREADY_LOCKED); /* TODO: sync access? I currently think it is NOT needed -- rgerhards, 2008-01-28 */ - pWtp->bThrdStateChanged = 1; /* indicate change, so harverster will be called */ + ATOMIC_STORE_1_TO_INT(pWtp->bThrdStateChanged); /* indicate change, so harverster will be called */ d_pthread_mutex_unlock(&pWtp->mut); pthread_setcancelstate(iCancelStateSave, NULL); @@ -405,7 +413,7 @@ wtiWorker(wti_t *pThis) pWtp->pfOnWorkerShutdown(pWtp->pUsr); wtiSetState(pThis, eWRKTHRD_TERMINATING, 0, MUTEX_ALREADY_LOCKED); - pWtp->bThrdStateChanged = 1; /* indicate change, so harverster will be called */ + ATOMIC_STORE_1_TO_INT(pWtp->bThrdStateChanged); /* indicate change, so harverster will be called */ d_pthread_mutex_unlock(&pThis->mut); pthread_setcancelstate(iCancelStateSave, NULL); -- cgit