From e397c34d2a6c7c1e4c116fd2363cb173e32eb2a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rainer Gerhards Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:21:15 +0200 Subject: finished transition to using inputName property ... plus some celanup and adding minor missing functionality (the rule debug info again tell the property name, not just number). --- runtime/rule.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'runtime/rule.c') diff --git a/runtime/rule.c b/runtime/rule.c index ce19146b..3a257a90 100644 --- a/runtime/rule.c +++ b/runtime/rule.c @@ -219,8 +219,8 @@ shouldProcessThisMessage(rule_t *pRule, msg_t *pMsg, int *bProcessMsg) bRet = (bRet == 1) ? 0 : 1; if(Debug) { - dbgprintf("Filter: check for property '%d' (value '%s') ", - pRule->f_filterData.prop.propID, pszPropVal); + dbgprintf("Filter: check for property '%s' (value '%s') ", + propIDToName(pRule->f_filterData.prop.propID), pszPropVal); if(pRule->f_filterData.prop.isNegated) dbgprintf("NOT "); dbgprintf("%s '%s': %s\n", @@ -373,8 +373,7 @@ CODESTARTobjDebugPrint(rule) dbgprintf("EXPRESSION-BASED Filter: can currently not be displayed"); } else { dbgprintf("PROPERTY-BASED Filter:\n"); - dbgprintf("\tProperty.: '%d'\n", pThis->f_filterData.prop.propID); -// TODO: XXXX ADD idtostring()! + dbgprintf("\tProperty.: '%s'\n", propIDToName(pThis->f_filterData.prop.propID)); dbgprintf("\tOperation: "); if(pThis->f_filterData.prop.isNegated) dbgprintf("NOT "); -- cgit