From b5b26c2960fb8de308a5f7aef1b13f44b0d76b2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rainer Gerhards <rgerhards@adiscon.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:07:22 +0200
Subject: minor update to rsyslog/syslog-ng comparison

---
 doc/rsyslog_ng_comparison.html | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'doc/rsyslog_ng_comparison.html')

diff --git a/doc/rsyslog_ng_comparison.html b/doc/rsyslog_ng_comparison.html
index 8e121a8d..7d12a4a7 100644
--- a/doc/rsyslog_ng_comparison.html
+++ b/doc/rsyslog_ng_comparison.html
@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@
 <h1>rsyslog vs. syslog-ng</h1>
 <p><small><i>Written by <a href="http://www.gerhards.net/rainer">Rainer Gerhards</a>
 (2008-05-06)</i></small></p>
+<p><i>Warning</i>: this comparison is a little outdated, take it with a grain
+of salt and be sure to check the links at the bottom (both syslog-ng as well as
+rsyslog features are missing, but our priority is on creating great software not
+continously updating this comparison ;)).
 <p>We have often been asked about a comparison sheet between
 rsyslog and syslog-ng. Unfortunately, I do not know much about
 syslog-ng, I did not even use it once. Also, there seems to be no
@@ -81,9 +85,10 @@ optional input</td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
 <td valign="top">Windows Event Log</td>
-<td valign="top">via <a href="http://www.eventreporter.com">EventReporter</a>
+<td valign="top">via a Windows event logging software such as
+<a href="http://www.eventreporter.com">EventReporter</a>
 or <a href="http://www.mwagent.com">MonitorWare Agent</a>
-(both commercial software)</td>
+(both commercial software, both fund rsyslog development)</td>
 <td valign="top">via separate Windows agent, paid
 edition only</td>
 </tr>
-- 
cgit