From 413fba03dc88bafb581554bcb07eacfdb9327588 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rainer Gerhards
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 11:48:07 +0200
Subject: finalized mail output support
---
doc/rsyslog_ng_comparison.html | 18 ++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
(limited to 'doc/rsyslog_ng_comparison.html')
diff --git a/doc/rsyslog_ng_comparison.html b/doc/rsyslog_ng_comparison.html
index 4ee8c10b..28413337 100644
--- a/doc/rsyslog_ng_comparison.html
+++ b/doc/rsyslog_ng_comparison.html
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
-
-rsyslog vs. syslog-ng - a comparison
+rsyslog vs. syslog-ng - a comparison
+
rsyslog vs. syslog-ng
Written by Rainer Gerhards
-(2008-02-28)
+(2008-04-08)
We have often been asked about a comparison sheet between
rsyslog and syslog-ng. Unfortunately, I do not know much about
syslog-ng, I did not even use it once. Also, there seems to be no
@@ -341,7 +341,9 @@ be placed on different disk
ability to process spooled
messages only during a configured timeframe (e.g. process messages only
during off-peak hours, during peak hours they are enqueued only) |
-yes (can independently be configured for the main queue and each action queue) |
+yes
+(can independently be configured for the main queue and each action
+queue) |
no |
@@ -424,6 +426,10 @@ including ability to present channel and priority as visible log data
yes |
not sure... |
+native ability to send mail messages |
+yes (ommail, introduced in 3.17.0) |
+not sure... |
+
good timestamp format control; at a
minimum, ISO 8601/RFC 3339 second-resolution UTC zone |
@@ -572,6 +578,6 @@ feature sheet. I have not yet been able to fully work through it. In
the mean time, you may want to read it in parallel. It is available at
Balabit's
site.
-This document is current as of 2008-04-07 and definitely
+
This document is current as of 2008-04-08 and definitely
incomplete (I did not yet manage to complete it!).
-
+
\ No newline at end of file
--
cgit