From 3abf567d2b57014381eda49018a0e2c21fa1b853 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rainer Gerhards Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:07:17 +0200 Subject: optimized template string generation --- action.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) (limited to 'action.c') diff --git a/action.c b/action.c index 22755e86..d214e808 100644 --- a/action.c +++ b/action.c @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ actionResetQueueParams(void) */ rsRetVal actionDestruct(action_t *pThis) { + int i; DEFiRet; ASSERT(pThis != NULL); @@ -195,7 +196,33 @@ rsRetVal actionDestruct(action_t *pThis) pthread_mutex_destroy(&pThis->mutActExec); d_free(pThis->pszName); d_free(pThis->ppTpl); + + /* message ptr cleanup */ + for(i = 0 ; i < pThis->iNumTpls ; ++i) { + if(pThis->ppMsgs[i] != NULL) { + switch(pThis->eParamPassing) { + case ACT_ARRAY_PASSING: +#if 0 /* later! */ + iArr = 0; + while(((char **)pThis->ppMsgs[i])[iArr] != NULL) { + d_free(((char **)pThis->ppMsgs[i])[iArr++]); + ((char **)pThis->ppMsgs[i])[iArr++] = NULL; + } + d_free(pThis->ppMsgs[i]); + pThis->ppMsgs[i] = NULL; +#endif + break; + case ACT_STRING_PASSING: + d_free(pThis->ppMsgs[i]); + break; + default: + assert(0); + } + } + } d_free(pThis->ppMsgs); + d_free(pThis->lenMsgs); + d_free(pThis); RETiRet; @@ -440,7 +467,7 @@ actionCallDoAction(action_t *pAction, msg_t *pMsg) for(i = 0 ; i < pAction->iNumTpls ; ++i) { switch(pAction->eParamPassing) { case ACT_STRING_PASSING: - CHKiRet(tplToString(pAction->ppTpl[i], pMsg, &(pAction->ppMsgs[i]))); + CHKiRet(tplToString(pAction->ppTpl[i], pMsg, &(pAction->ppMsgs[i]), &(pAction->lenMsgs[i]))); break; case ACT_ARRAY_PASSING: CHKiRet(tplToArray(pAction->ppTpl[i], pMsg, (uchar***) &(pAction->ppMsgs[i]))); @@ -513,7 +540,6 @@ finalize_it: pAction->ppMsgs[i] = NULL; break; case ACT_STRING_PASSING: - d_free(pAction->ppMsgs[i]); break; default: assert(0); @@ -727,32 +753,13 @@ finalize_it: } -/* call the configured action. Does all necessary housekeeping. - * rgerhards, 2007-08-01 - * FYI: currently, this function is only called from the queue - * consumer. So we (conceptually) run detached from the input - * threads (which also means we may run much later than when the - * message was generated). +/* helper to actonCallAction, mostly needed because of this damn + * pthread_cleanup_push() POSIX macro... */ -#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wempty-body" -rsRetVal -actionCallAction(action_t *pAction, msg_t *pMsg) +static rsRetVal +doActionCallAction(action_t *pAction, msg_t *pMsg) { DEFiRet; - int iCancelStateSave; - - ISOBJ_TYPE_assert(pMsg, msg); - ASSERT(pAction != NULL); - - /* Make sure nodbody else modifies/uses this action object. Right now, this - * is important because of "message repeated n times" processing and potentially - * multiple worker threads. -- rgerhards, 2007-12-11 - */ - pthread_setcancelstate(PTHREAD_CANCEL_DISABLE, &iCancelStateSave); - LockObj(pAction); - pthread_cleanup_push(mutexCancelCleanup, pAction->Sync_mut); - pthread_setcancelstate(iCancelStateSave, NULL); - /* first, we need to check if this is a disabled * entry. If so, we must not further process it. * rgerhards 2005-09-26 @@ -813,10 +820,43 @@ actionCallAction(action_t *pAction, msg_t *pMsg) } finalize_it: - pthread_setcancelstate(PTHREAD_CANCEL_DISABLE, &iCancelStateSave); - UnlockObj(pAction); - pthread_cleanup_pop(0); /* remove mutex cleanup handler */ - pthread_setcancelstate(iCancelStateSave, NULL); + RETiRet; +} + +/* call the configured action. Does all necessary housekeeping. + * rgerhards, 2007-08-01 + * FYI: currently, this function is only called from the queue + * consumer. So we (conceptually) run detached from the input + * threads (which also means we may run much later than when the + * message was generated). + */ +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wempty-body" +rsRetVal +actionCallAction(action_t *pAction, msg_t *pMsg) +{ + DEFiRet; + int iCancelStateSave; + + ISOBJ_TYPE_assert(pMsg, msg); + ASSERT(pAction != NULL); + + /* We need to lock the mutex only for repeated line processing. + * rgerhards, 2009-06-19 + */ + if(pAction->f_ReduceRepeated == 1) { + pthread_setcancelstate(PTHREAD_CANCEL_DISABLE, &iCancelStateSave); + LockObj(pAction); + pthread_cleanup_push(mutexCancelCleanup, pAction->Sync_mut); + pthread_setcancelstate(iCancelStateSave, NULL); + iRet = doActionCallAction(pAction, pMsg); + pthread_setcancelstate(PTHREAD_CANCEL_DISABLE, &iCancelStateSave); + UnlockObj(pAction); + pthread_cleanup_pop(0); /* remove mutex cleanup handler */ + pthread_setcancelstate(iCancelStateSave, NULL); + } else { + iRet = doActionCallAction(pAction, pMsg); + } + RETiRet; } #pragma GCC diagnostic warning "-Wempty-body" @@ -903,8 +943,9 @@ addAction(action_t **ppAction, modInfo_t *pMod, void *pModData, omodStringReques */ if(pAction->iNumTpls > 0) { /* we first need to create the template pointer array */ - CHKmalloc(pAction->ppTpl = (struct template *)calloc(pAction->iNumTpls, sizeof(struct template *))); - CHKmalloc(pAction->ppMsgs = (uchar**) malloc(pAction->iNumTpls * sizeof(uchar *))); + CHKmalloc(pAction->ppTpl = (struct template **)calloc(pAction->iNumTpls, sizeof(struct template *))); + CHKmalloc(pAction->ppMsgs = (uchar**) calloc(pAction->iNumTpls, sizeof(uchar *))); + CHKmalloc(pAction->lenMsgs = (size_t*) calloc(pAction->iNumTpls, sizeof(size_t))); } for(i = 0 ; i < pAction->iNumTpls ; ++i) { -- cgit