| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
runtime/rsyslog.h
|
| | | |
|
| |\|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Note that this was NOT a trivial merge, and there may be
some issues. This needs to be seen when we continue developing.
Conflicts:
runtime/msg.h
runtime/obj.h
runtime/queue.c
runtime/srUtils.h
runtime/stream.c
runtime/stream.h
runtime/wti.c
tests/Makefile.am
tools/omfile.c
tools/syslogd.c
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is the first shot at this functionality. Currently, we run off a fixed
counter in the rsyslogd mainloop, which needs to be restructured. But this
code works, so it is a good time for a commit.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
... by moving code to stream.c. Thanks to the new design, new cases are
not really needed, resulting in cleaner code.
I also did a cleanup of header file usage as a side-activity.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
... restoring missing functionality after the restructuring of imfile. As
a side-effect, this also lays the foundation for even more reliable queue
engine operations (but this is not yet done).
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
now cleand up omfile and straighted out some things. The only commented-out
code left is code that must be moved/merged to the stream class, my next target.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
now some basic operations are carried out via the stream class.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
... and also made it callable via an rsyslog interface rather then
relying on the OS loader (important if we go for using it inside
loadbale modules, which we soon possible will)
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
... and also improved the test suite. There is a design issue in the
v3 queue engine that manifested to some serious problems with the new
processing mode. However, in v3 shutdown may take eternally if a queue
runs in DA mode, is configured to preserve data AND the action fails and
retries immediately. There is no cure available for v3, it would
require doing much of the work we have done on the new engine. The window
of exposure, as one might guess from the description, is very small. That
is probably the reason why we have not seen it in practice.
|
| |
|
