diff options
author | Rainer Gerhards <rgerhards@adiscon.com> | 2011-02-25 14:23:25 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rainer Gerhards <rgerhards@adiscon.com> | 2011-02-25 14:23:25 +0100 |
commit | dbf181c3d34570a450430a6616f1d1a5ce0a242c (patch) | |
tree | 49ce0e902f30d1b530edf4f703da595b0289681e | |
parent | dfa88369d4ca4290db56b843f9eabdae1bfe0fd5 (diff) | |
download | rsyslog-dbf181c3d34570a450430a6616f1d1a5ce0a242c.tar.gz rsyslog-dbf181c3d34570a450430a6616f1d1a5ce0a242c.tar.xz rsyslog-dbf181c3d34570a450430a6616f1d1a5ce0a242c.zip |
bugfix: fixed a memory leak and potential abort condition
this could happen if multiple rulesets were used and some output batches
contained messages belonging to more than one ruleset.
fixes: http://bugzilla.adiscon.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226
fixes: http://bugzilla.adiscon.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218
-rw-r--r-- | ChangeLog | 5 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | runtime/batch.h | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | runtime/ruleset.c | 23 |
3 files changed, 26 insertions, 10 deletions
@@ -1,5 +1,10 @@ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version 5.6.4 [V5-STABLE] (rgerhards), 2011-02-25 +- bugfix: fixed a memory leak and potential abort condition + this could happen if multiple rulesets were used and some output batches + contained messages belonging to more than one ruleset. + fixes: http://bugzilla.adiscon.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226 + fixes: http://bugzilla.adiscon.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218 - bugfix: memory leak when $RepeatedMsgReduction on was used bug tracker: http://bugzilla.adiscon.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- diff --git a/runtime/batch.h b/runtime/batch.h index d0504f2b..944889bd 100644 --- a/runtime/batch.h +++ b/runtime/batch.h @@ -136,11 +136,16 @@ batchIsValidElem(batch_t *pBatch, int i) { /* copy one batch element to another. * This creates a complete duplicate in those cases where * it is needed. Use duplication only when absolutely necessary! + * Note that all working fields are reset to zeros. If that were + * not done, we would have potential problems with invalid + * or double pointer frees. * rgerhards, 2010-06-10 */ static inline void batchCopyElem(batch_obj_t *pDest, batch_obj_t *pSrc) { - memcpy(pDest, pSrc, sizeof(batch_obj_t)); + memset(pDest, 0, sizeof(batch_obj_t)); + pDest->pUsrp = pSrc->pUsrp; + pDest->state = pSrc->state; } @@ -171,6 +176,7 @@ batchFree(batch_t *pBatch) { static inline rsRetVal batchInit(batch_t *pBatch, int maxElem) { DEFiRet; + pBatch->iDoneUpTo = 0; pBatch->maxElem = maxElem; CHKmalloc(pBatch->pElem = calloc((size_t)maxElem, sizeof(batch_obj_t))); // TODO: replace calloc by inidividual writes? diff --git a/runtime/ruleset.c b/runtime/ruleset.c index 0584e8d6..c9c64a38 100644 --- a/runtime/ruleset.c +++ b/runtime/ruleset.c @@ -171,35 +171,40 @@ processBatchMultiRuleset(batch_t *pBatch) int i; int iStart; /* start index of partial batch */ int iNew; /* index for new (temporary) batch */ + int bHaveUnprocessed; /* do we (still) have unprocessed entries? (loop term predicate) */ DEFiRet; - CHKiRet(batchInit(&snglRuleBatch, pBatch->nElem)); - snglRuleBatch.pbShutdownImmediate = pBatch->pbShutdownImmediate; - - while(1) { /* loop broken inside */ + do { + bHaveUnprocessed = 0; /* search for first unprocessed element */ for(iStart = 0 ; iStart < pBatch->nElem && pBatch->pElem[iStart].state == BATCH_STATE_DISC ; ++iStart) /* just search, no action */; - if(iStart == pBatch->nElem) - FINALIZE; /* everything processed */ + break; /* everything processed */ /* prepare temporary batch */ + CHKiRet(batchInit(&snglRuleBatch, pBatch->nElem)); + snglRuleBatch.pbShutdownImmediate = pBatch->pbShutdownImmediate; currRuleset = batchElemGetRuleset(pBatch, iStart); iNew = 0; for(i = iStart ; i < pBatch->nElem ; ++i) { if(batchElemGetRuleset(pBatch, i) == currRuleset) { - batchCopyElem(&(snglRuleBatch.pElem[iNew++]), &(pBatch->pElem[i])); + /* for performance reasons, we copy only those members that we actually need */ + snglRuleBatch.pElem[iNew].pUsrp = pBatch->pElem[i].pUsrp; + snglRuleBatch.pElem[iNew].state = pBatch->pElem[i].state; + ++iNew; /* We indicate the element also as done, so it will not be processed again */ pBatch->pElem[i].state = BATCH_STATE_DISC; + } else { + bHaveUnprocessed = 1; } } snglRuleBatch.nElem = iNew; /* was left just right by the for loop */ batchSetSingleRuleset(&snglRuleBatch, 1); /* process temp batch */ processBatch(&snglRuleBatch); - } - batchFree(&snglRuleBatch); + batchFree(&snglRuleBatch); + } while(bHaveUnprocessed == 1); finalize_it: RETiRet; |