bugfix: problems in failover action handling

closes: http://bugzilla.adiscon.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254

3 files changed, 14 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 4d1fe09f..6cdfb670 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Version 5.8.2  [V5-stable] (rgerhards), 2011-06-??
 - bugfix: problems in failover action handling
-  closes: http://bugzilla.adiscon.com/show_bug.cgi?id=270 (not yet confirmed!)
+  closes: http://bugzilla.adiscon.com/show_bug.cgi?id=270
+  closes: http://bugzilla.adiscon.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254
 - bugfix: memory leak in imtcp & subsystems under some circumstances
   This leak is tied to error conditions which lead to incorrect cleanup
   of some data structures. [backport from v6]
diff --git a/action.c b/action.c
index 7909d8e3..54a05fc3 100644
--- a/action.c
+++ b/action.c
@@ -979,11 +979,13 @@ dbgprintf("XXXXX:     tryDoAction %p, pnElem %d, nElem %d\n", pAction, *pnElem,
 			if(localRet == RS_RET_OK) {
 				/* mark messages as committed */
 				while(iCommittedUpTo <= i) {
+					pBatch->pElem[iCommittedUpTo].bPrevWasSuspended = 0; /* we had success! */
 					pBatch->pElem[iCommittedUpTo++].state = BATCH_STATE_COMM;
 				}
 			} else if(localRet == RS_RET_PREVIOUS_COMMITTED) {
 				/* mark messages as committed */
 				while(iCommittedUpTo < i) {
+					pBatch->pElem[iCommittedUpTo].bPrevWasSuspended = 0; /* we had success! */
 					pBatch->pElem[iCommittedUpTo++].state = BATCH_STATE_COMM;
 				}
 				pBatch->pElem[i].state = BATCH_STATE_SUB;
@@ -1563,6 +1565,9 @@ doQueueEnqObjDirectBatch(action_t *pAction, batch_t *pBatch)
 			}
 			if(pBatch->pElem[i].bFilterOK)
 				bNeedSubmit = 1;
+			DBGPRINTF("action %p[%d]: filterOK:%d state:%d execWhenPrev:%d prevWasSusp:%d\n",
+				   pAction, i, pBatch->pElem[i].bFilterOK,  pBatch->pElem[i].state,
+				   pAction->bExecWhenPrevSusp, pBatch->pElem[i].bPrevWasSuspended);
 		}
 		if(bNeedSubmit) {
 			iRet = qqueueEnqObjDirectBatch(pAction->pQueue, pBatch);
@@ -1571,6 +1576,9 @@ doQueueEnqObjDirectBatch(action_t *pAction, batch_t *pBatch)
 		}
 		if(bModifiedFilter) {
 			for(i = 0 ; i < batchNumMsgs(pBatch) ; ++i) {
+				DBGPRINTF("action %p: filterOK:%d state:%d execWhenPrev:%d prevWasSusp:%d\n",
+					   pAction, pBatch->pElem[i].bFilterOK,  pBatch->pElem[i].state,
+					   pAction->bExecWhenPrevSusp, pBatch->pElem[i].bPrevWasSuspended);
 				/* note: clang static code analyzer reports a false positive below */
 				pBatch->pElem[i].bFilterOK = pFilterSave[i];
 			}
@@ -1594,21 +1602,17 @@ doSubmitToActionQBatch(action_t *pAction, batch_t *pBatch)
 	int i;
 	DEFiRet;
 
-	/* TODO
-	ich arbeite an dieser funktion, es müssen die verscheidenen modi geprüft werden. ausserdem
-	muss geschaut werden, in welche anderen funktionen die neue Funktionalität noch eingebaut
-	werden muss, bzw. ob man das an zentralerer stelle machen kann. Am besten die gesamte
-	filter evaluation nochmal druchgehen (also das füllen des arrays).
-	*/
-
 	DBGPRINTF("Called action(Batch), logging to %s\n", module.GetStateName(pAction->pMod));
 
 	if(pAction->pQueue->qType == QUEUETYPE_DIRECT) {
 		iRet = doQueueEnqObjDirectBatch(pAction, pBatch);
-	} else {  /* in this case, we do single submits to the queue. 
+	} else {/* in this case, we do single submits to the queue. 
 		 * TODO: optimize this, we may do at least a multi-submit!
 		 */
 		for(i = 0 ; i < batchNumMsgs(pBatch) && !*(pBatch->pbShutdownImmediate) ; ++i) {
+			DBGPRINTF("action %p: filterOK:%d state:%d execWhenPrev:%d prevWasSusp:%d\n",
+		           pAction, pBatch->pElem[i].bFilterOK,  pBatch->pElem[i].state,
+			   pAction->bExecWhenPrevSusp, pBatch->pElem[i].bPrevWasSuspended);
 			if(   pBatch->pElem[i].bFilterOK
 			   && pBatch->pElem[i].state != BATCH_STATE_DISC
 			   && (pAction->bExecWhenPrevSusp == 0 || pBatch->pElem[i].bPrevWasSuspended == 1)) {
diff --git a/runtime/rule.c b/runtime/rule.c
index 19239d61..0776e2dc 100644
--- a/runtime/rule.c
+++ b/runtime/rule.c
@@ -279,7 +279,6 @@ processBatch(rule_t *pThis, batch_t *pBatch)
 		if(localRet != RS_RET_OK) {
 			DBGPRINTF("processBatch: iRet %d returned from shouldProcessThisMessage, "
 			          "ignoring message\n", localRet);
-			
 			pBatch->pElem[i].bFilterOK = 0;
 		}
 		if(pBatch->pElem[i].bFilterOK) {