From 5740afdb68abadc473fd5392df733558a58c1254 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: FUJITA Tomonori Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:46:18 +0900 Subject: swiotlb: Add swiotlb_free() function swiotlb_free() function frees all allocated memory for swiotlb. We need to initialize swiotlb before IOMMU initialization (x86 and powerpc needs to allocate memory from bootmem allocator). If IOMMU initialization is successful, we need to free swiotlb resource (don't want to waste 64MB). Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: chrisw@sous-sol.org Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org Cc: joerg.roedel@amd.com Cc: muli@il.ibm.com LKML-Reference: <1257849980-22640-8-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> [ -v2: build fix for the !CONFIG_SWIOTLB case ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- lib/swiotlb.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) (limited to 'lib') diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c index ac25cd28e80..eee512b63f1 100644 --- a/lib/swiotlb.c +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c @@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ static phys_addr_t *io_tlb_orig_addr; */ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(io_tlb_lock); +static int late_alloc; + static int __init setup_io_tlb_npages(char *str) { @@ -262,6 +264,8 @@ swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size(size_t default_size) swiotlb_print_info(bytes); + late_alloc = 1; + return 0; cleanup4: @@ -281,6 +285,32 @@ cleanup1: return -ENOMEM; } +void __init swiotlb_free(void) +{ + if (!io_tlb_overflow_buffer) + return; + + if (late_alloc) { + free_pages((unsigned long)io_tlb_overflow_buffer, + get_order(io_tlb_overflow)); + free_pages((unsigned long)io_tlb_orig_addr, + get_order(io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(phys_addr_t))); + free_pages((unsigned long)io_tlb_list, get_order(io_tlb_nslabs * + sizeof(int))); + free_pages((unsigned long)io_tlb_start, + get_order(io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT)); + } else { + free_bootmem_late(__pa(io_tlb_overflow_buffer), + io_tlb_overflow); + free_bootmem_late(__pa(io_tlb_orig_addr), + io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(phys_addr_t)); + free_bootmem_late(__pa(io_tlb_list), + io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(int)); + free_bootmem_late(__pa(io_tlb_start), + io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT); + } +} + static int is_swiotlb_buffer(phys_addr_t paddr) { return paddr >= virt_to_phys(io_tlb_start) && -- cgit From ad32e8cb86e7894aac51c8963eaa9f36bb8a4e14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: FUJITA Tomonori Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:46:19 +0900 Subject: swiotlb: Defer swiotlb init printing, export swiotlb_print_info() This enables us to avoid printing swiotlb memory info when we initialize swiotlb. After swiotlb initialization, we could find that we don't need swiotlb. This patch removes the code to print swiotlb memory info in swiotlb_init() and exports the function to do that. Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: chrisw@sous-sol.org Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org Cc: joerg.roedel@amd.com Cc: muli@il.ibm.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org LKML-Reference: <1257849980-22640-9-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> [ -v2: merge up conflict ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- lib/swiotlb.c | 15 ++++++++------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib') diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c index eee512b63f1..0c12d7cce30 100644 --- a/lib/swiotlb.c +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c @@ -123,8 +123,9 @@ static dma_addr_t swiotlb_virt_to_bus(struct device *hwdev, return phys_to_dma(hwdev, virt_to_phys(address)); } -static void swiotlb_print_info(unsigned long bytes) +void swiotlb_print_info(void) { + unsigned long bytes = io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT; phys_addr_t pstart, pend; pstart = virt_to_phys(io_tlb_start); @@ -142,7 +143,7 @@ static void swiotlb_print_info(unsigned long bytes) * structures for the software IO TLB used to implement the DMA API. */ void __init -swiotlb_init_with_default_size(size_t default_size) +swiotlb_init_with_default_size(size_t default_size, int verbose) { unsigned long i, bytes; @@ -178,14 +179,14 @@ swiotlb_init_with_default_size(size_t default_size) io_tlb_overflow_buffer = alloc_bootmem_low(io_tlb_overflow); if (!io_tlb_overflow_buffer) panic("Cannot allocate SWIOTLB overflow buffer!\n"); - - swiotlb_print_info(bytes); + if (verbose) + swiotlb_print_info(); } void __init -swiotlb_init(void) +swiotlb_init(int verbose) { - swiotlb_init_with_default_size(64 * (1<<20)); /* default to 64MB */ + swiotlb_init_with_default_size(64 * (1<<20), verbose); /* default to 64MB */ } /* @@ -262,7 +263,7 @@ swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size(size_t default_size) if (!io_tlb_overflow_buffer) goto cleanup4; - swiotlb_print_info(bytes); + swiotlb_print_info(); late_alloc = 1; -- cgit From 75f1cdf1dda92cae037ec848ae63690d91913eac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: FUJITA Tomonori Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:46:20 +0900 Subject: x86: Handle HW IOMMU initialization failure gracefully If HW IOMMU initialization fails (Intel VT-d often does this, typically due to BIOS bugs), we fall back to nommu. It doesn't work for the majority since nowadays we have more than 4GB memory so we must use swiotlb instead of nommu. The problem is that it's too late to initialize swiotlb when HW IOMMU initialization fails. We need to allocate swiotlb memory earlier from bootmem allocator. Chris explained the issue in detail: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125657444317079&w=2 The current x86 IOMMU initialization sequence is too complicated and handling the above issue makes it more hacky. This patch changes x86 IOMMU initialization sequence to handle the above issue cleanly. The new x86 IOMMU initialization sequence are: 1. we initialize the swiotlb (and setting swiotlb to 1) in the case of (max_pfn > MAX_DMA32_PFN && !no_iommu). dma_ops is set to swiotlb_dma_ops or nommu_dma_ops. if swiotlb usage is forced by the boot option, we finish here. 2. we call the detection functions of all the IOMMUs 3. the detection function sets x86_init.iommu.iommu_init to the IOMMU initialization function (so we can avoid calling the initialization functions of all the IOMMUs needlessly). 4. if the IOMMU initialization function doesn't need to swiotlb then sets swiotlb to zero (e.g. the initialization is sucessful). 5. if we find that swiotlb is set to zero, we free swiotlb resource. Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: chrisw@sous-sol.org Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org Cc: joerg.roedel@amd.com Cc: muli@il.ibm.com LKML-Reference: <1257849980-22640-10-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- lib/swiotlb.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'lib') diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c index 0c12d7cce30..e6755a0574f 100644 --- a/lib/swiotlb.c +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c @@ -109,8 +109,10 @@ setup_io_tlb_npages(char *str) } if (*str == ',') ++str; - if (!strcmp(str, "force")) + if (!strcmp(str, "force")) { swiotlb_force = 1; + swiotlb = 1; + } return 1; } __setup("swiotlb=", setup_io_tlb_npages); -- cgit From b18485e7acfe1a634615d1c628ef644c0d58d472 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: FUJITA Tomonori Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:03:28 +0900 Subject: swiotlb: Remove the swiotlb variable usage POWERPC doesn't expect it to be used. This fixes the linux-next build failure reported by Stephen Rothwell: lib/swiotlb.c: In function 'setup_io_tlb_npages': lib/swiotlb.c:114: error: 'swiotlb' undeclared (first use in this function) Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: peterz@infradead.org LKML-Reference: <20091112000258F.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- lib/swiotlb.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib') diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c index e6755a0574f..795472d8ae2 100644 --- a/lib/swiotlb.c +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c @@ -109,10 +109,9 @@ setup_io_tlb_npages(char *str) } if (*str == ',') ++str; - if (!strcmp(str, "force")) { + if (!strcmp(str, "force")) swiotlb_force = 1; - swiotlb = 1; - } + return 1; } __setup("swiotlb=", setup_io_tlb_npages); -- cgit