From 5ff55717674470b96562f931f778c878080755b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Airlie Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 13:57:03 +1000 Subject: drm/radeon/kms: fix r300 vram width calculations This was incorrect according to the docs and the UMS driver does it like this. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers') diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c index e699e6d053d..43b55a030b4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c @@ -506,11 +506,14 @@ void r300_vram_info(struct radeon_device *rdev) /* DDR for all card after R300 & IGP */ rdev->mc.vram_is_ddr = true; + tmp = RREG32(RADEON_MEM_CNTL); - if (tmp & R300_MEM_NUM_CHANNELS_MASK) { - rdev->mc.vram_width = 128; - } else { - rdev->mc.vram_width = 64; + tmp &= R300_MEM_NUM_CHANNELS_MASK; + switch (tmp) { + case 0: rdev->mc.vram_width = 64; break; + case 1: rdev->mc.vram_width = 128; break; + case 2: rdev->mc.vram_width = 256; break; + default: rdev->mc.vram_width = 128; break; } r100_vram_init_sizes(rdev); -- cgit