From c6387a48cf5958e43c201fc27a158c328927531a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "David S. Miller" Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 01:21:29 -0700 Subject: [SPARC]: Kill __irq_itoa(). This ugly hack was long overdue to die. It was a way to print out Sparc interrupts in a more freindly format, since IRQ numbers were arbitrary opaque 32-bit integers which vectored into PIL levels. These 32-bit integers were not necessarily in the 0-->NR_IRQS range, but the PILs they vectored to were. The idea now is that we will increase NR_IRQS a little bit and use a virtual<-->real IRQ number mapping scheme similar to PowerPC. That makes this IRQ printing hack irrelevant, and furthermore only a handful of drivers actually used __irq_itoa() making it even less useful. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- drivers/char/rtc.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/char/rtc.c') diff --git a/drivers/char/rtc.c b/drivers/char/rtc.c index 7cac6d05d72..f6686fcce80 100644 --- a/drivers/char/rtc.c +++ b/drivers/char/rtc.c @@ -960,10 +960,6 @@ found: * PCI Slot 2 INTA# (and some INTx# in Slot 1). */ if (request_irq(rtc_irq, rtc_interrupt, SA_SHIRQ, "rtc", (void *)&rtc_port)) { - /* - * Standard way for sparc to print irq's is to use - * __irq_itoa(). I think for EBus it's ok to use %d. - */ printk(KERN_ERR "rtc: cannot register IRQ %d\n", rtc_irq); return -EIO; } -- cgit