From 3b5fee5952ff7eb6ff7a64247a01040b8b331b74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Holger Macht Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:40:34 +0100 Subject: ACPI: Do not pass NULL to acpi_get_handle() when looking for _EJD When trying to get the acpi_handle from an acpi_buffer, pass ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT instead of NULL to acpi_get_handle(). This fixes the detection of dock dependent bays. Signed-off-by: Holger Macht Tested-by: Thomas Renninger Signed-off-by: Len Brown --- drivers/acpi/scan.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/acpi') diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c index 3fac011f9cf..d9b914303b9 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c @@ -609,7 +609,8 @@ acpi_bus_get_ejd(acpi_handle handle, acpi_handle *ejd) status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_EJD", NULL, &buffer); if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) { obj = buffer.pointer; - status = acpi_get_handle(NULL, obj->string.pointer, ejd); + status = acpi_get_handle(ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT, obj->string.pointer, + ejd); kfree(buffer.pointer); } return status; -- cgit From a527f2d7fe58ce95bfec998f3dc6f658c777a2f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Carlos Corbacho Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:34:34 +0000 Subject: ACPI: WMI: Clean up handling of spec violating data blocks Acer violate the ACPI-WMI spec by declaring some of their data blocks as expensive, but with no corresponding WCxx method. There is already some workaround code in to handle the initial WCxx call (we just ignore a failure here); but we need to properly check if the second, "clean up", WCxx call is actually needed or not, rather than fail simply because it isn't there. Signed-off-by: Carlos Corbacho Signed-off-by: Len Brown --- drivers/acpi/wmi.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/acpi') diff --git a/drivers/acpi/wmi.c b/drivers/acpi/wmi.c index efacc9f8bfe..c33b1c6e93b 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/wmi.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/wmi.c @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ struct acpi_buffer *out) { struct guid_block *block = NULL; struct wmi_block *wblock = NULL; - acpi_handle handle; + acpi_handle handle, wc_handle; acpi_status status, wc_status = AE_ERROR; struct acpi_object_list input, wc_input; union acpi_object wc_params[1], wq_params[1]; @@ -338,8 +338,10 @@ struct acpi_buffer *out) * expensive, but have no corresponding WCxx method. So we * should not fail if this happens. */ - wc_status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, wc_method, - &wc_input, NULL); + wc_status = acpi_get_handle(handle, wc_method, &wc_handle); + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(wc_status)) + wc_status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, wc_method, + &wc_input, NULL); } strcpy(method, "WQ"); @@ -351,7 +353,7 @@ struct acpi_buffer *out) * If ACPI_WMI_EXPENSIVE, call the relevant WCxx method, even if * the WQxx method failed - we should disable collection anyway. */ - if ((block->flags & ACPI_WMI_EXPENSIVE) && wc_status) { + if ((block->flags & ACPI_WMI_EXPENSIVE) && ACPI_SUCCESS(wc_status)) { wc_params[0].integer.value = 0; status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, wc_method, &wc_input, NULL); -- cgit