summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRam Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>2005-11-07 17:17:04 -0500
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org>2005-11-07 18:18:10 -0800
commit70fbcdf4d252c6b17cc249cb9ac9b220cb0b863d (patch)
treecefa087774953dd7a2181513427577286f8e9f63 /fs
parent5b83d2c5c0afcf5a3517cf00d9ceb41b8345e01b (diff)
downloadkernel-crypto-70fbcdf4d252c6b17cc249cb9ac9b220cb0b863d.tar.gz
kernel-crypto-70fbcdf4d252c6b17cc249cb9ac9b220cb0b863d.tar.xz
kernel-crypto-70fbcdf4d252c6b17cc249cb9ac9b220cb0b863d.zip
[PATCH] umount_tree() locking change
umount is done under the protection of the namespace semaphore. This can lead to intresting deadlocks when the last reference to a mount is released, if filesystem code is in sufficiently nasty state. This collects all the to-be-released-mounts and releases them after releasing the namespace semaphore. That both reduces the time we are holding namespace semaphore and gets the things more robust. Idea proposed by Al Viro. Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
-rw-r--r--fs/namespace.c84
1 files changed, 51 insertions, 33 deletions
diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
index dfeeab964e8..c2ffa0f349f 100644
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -394,32 +394,45 @@ int may_umount(struct vfsmount *mnt)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(may_umount);
-static void umount_tree(struct vfsmount *mnt)
+static void release_mounts(struct list_head *head)
+{
+ struct vfsmount *mnt;
+ while(!list_empty(head)) {
+ mnt = list_entry(head->next, struct vfsmount, mnt_hash);
+ list_del_init(&mnt->mnt_hash);
+ if (mnt->mnt_parent != mnt) {
+ struct dentry *dentry;
+ struct vfsmount *m;
+ spin_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
+ dentry = mnt->mnt_mountpoint;
+ m = mnt->mnt_parent;
+ mnt->mnt_mountpoint = mnt->mnt_root;
+ mnt->mnt_parent = mnt;
+ spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
+ dput(dentry);
+ mntput(m);
+ }
+ mntput(mnt);
+ }
+}
+
+static void umount_tree(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct list_head *kill)
{
struct vfsmount *p;
- LIST_HEAD(kill);
for (p = mnt; p; p = next_mnt(p, mnt)) {
- list_del(&p->mnt_list);
- list_add(&p->mnt_list, &kill);
- __touch_namespace(p->mnt_namespace);
- p->mnt_namespace = NULL;
+ list_del(&p->mnt_hash);
+ list_add(&p->mnt_hash, kill);
}
- while (!list_empty(&kill)) {
- mnt = list_entry(kill.next, struct vfsmount, mnt_list);
- list_del_init(&mnt->mnt_list);
- list_del_init(&mnt->mnt_expire);
- if (mnt->mnt_parent == mnt) {
- spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
- } else {
- struct nameidata old_nd;
- detach_mnt(mnt, &old_nd);
- spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
- path_release(&old_nd);
- }
- mntput(mnt);
- spin_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(p, kill, mnt_hash) {
+ list_del_init(&p->mnt_expire);
+ list_del_init(&p->mnt_list);
+ __touch_namespace(p->mnt_namespace);
+ p->mnt_namespace = NULL;
+ list_del_init(&p->mnt_child);
+ if (p->mnt_parent != p)
+ mnt->mnt_mountpoint->d_mounted--;
}
}
@@ -427,6 +440,7 @@ static int do_umount(struct vfsmount *mnt, int flags)
{
struct super_block *sb = mnt->mnt_sb;
int retval;
+ LIST_HEAD(umount_list);
retval = security_sb_umount(mnt, flags);
if (retval)
@@ -497,13 +511,14 @@ static int do_umount(struct vfsmount *mnt, int flags)
retval = -EBUSY;
if (atomic_read(&mnt->mnt_count) == 2 || flags & MNT_DETACH) {
if (!list_empty(&mnt->mnt_list))
- umount_tree(mnt);
+ umount_tree(mnt, &umount_list);
retval = 0;
}
spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
if (retval)
security_sb_umount_busy(mnt);
up_write(&current->namespace->sem);
+ release_mounts(&umount_list);
return retval;
}
@@ -616,9 +631,11 @@ static struct vfsmount *copy_tree(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry)
return res;
Enomem:
if (res) {
+ LIST_HEAD(umount_list);
spin_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
- umount_tree(res);
+ umount_tree(res, &umount_list);
spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
+ release_mounts(&umount_list);
}
return NULL;
}
@@ -698,9 +715,11 @@ static int do_loopback(struct nameidata *nd, char *old_name, int recurse)
err = graft_tree(mnt, nd);
if (err) {
+ LIST_HEAD(umount_list);
spin_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
- umount_tree(mnt);
+ umount_tree(mnt, &umount_list);
spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
+ release_mounts(&umount_list);
}
out:
@@ -875,7 +894,8 @@ unlock:
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(do_add_mount);
-static void expire_mount(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct list_head *mounts)
+static void expire_mount(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct list_head *mounts,
+ struct list_head *umounts)
{
spin_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
@@ -893,16 +913,12 @@ static void expire_mount(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct list_head *mounts)
* contributed by the vfsmount parent and the mntget above
*/
if (atomic_read(&mnt->mnt_count) == 2) {
- struct nameidata old_nd;
-
/* delete from the namespace */
touch_namespace(mnt->mnt_namespace);
list_del_init(&mnt->mnt_list);
mnt->mnt_namespace = NULL;
- detach_mnt(mnt, &old_nd);
+ umount_tree(mnt, umounts);
spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
- path_release(&old_nd);
- mntput(mnt);
} else {
/*
* Someone brought it back to life whilst we didn't have any
@@ -951,6 +967,7 @@ void mark_mounts_for_expiry(struct list_head *mounts)
* - dispose of the corpse
*/
while (!list_empty(&graveyard)) {
+ LIST_HEAD(umounts);
mnt = list_entry(graveyard.next, struct vfsmount, mnt_expire);
list_del_init(&mnt->mnt_expire);
@@ -963,12 +980,11 @@ void mark_mounts_for_expiry(struct list_head *mounts)
spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
down_write(&namespace->sem);
- expire_mount(mnt, mounts);
+ expire_mount(mnt, mounts, &umounts);
up_write(&namespace->sem);
-
+ release_mounts(&umounts);
mntput(mnt);
put_namespace(namespace);
-
spin_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
}
@@ -1508,12 +1524,14 @@ void __init mnt_init(unsigned long mempages)
void __put_namespace(struct namespace *namespace)
{
struct vfsmount *root = namespace->root;
+ LIST_HEAD(umount_list);
namespace->root = NULL;
spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
down_write(&namespace->sem);
spin_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
- umount_tree(root);
+ umount_tree(root, &umount_list);
spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
up_write(&namespace->sem);
+ release_mounts(&umount_list);
kfree(namespace);
}