summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>2008-01-12 17:56:36 -0500
committerLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>2008-01-12 17:56:36 -0500
commit66a21736defda339cd93a0e70c1120ab813640f6 (patch)
tree34bf9ec577fc8900279ac033ae648909e6badd32
parent2c838197751db19d08a00e633e33dce23a69fb0c (diff)
downloadkernel-crypto-66a21736defda339cd93a0e70c1120ab813640f6.tar.gz
kernel-crypto-66a21736defda339cd93a0e70c1120ab813640f6.tar.xz
kernel-crypto-66a21736defda339cd93a0e70c1120ab813640f6.zip
pnpacpi: print resource shortage message only once
pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of IO resources: 40 While this message is a real error and should thus remain KERN_ERR (even a new dmesg line is seen as a regression by some, since it was not printed in 2.6.23...) it is certainly impolite to print this warning 50 times should you happen to have the oddball system with 90 io resources under a device... So print the warning just once. In 2.6.25 we'll get rid of the limits altogether and these warnings will vanish with them. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9535 Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-rw-r--r--drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c14
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c b/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c
index 3c5eb374adf..f7b8648acbf 100644
--- a/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c
+++ b/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static void pnpacpi_parse_allocated_irqresource(struct pnp_resource_table *res,
int i = 0;
int irq;
int p, t;
+ static unsigned char warned;
if (!valid_IRQ(gsi))
return;
@@ -83,9 +84,10 @@ static void pnpacpi_parse_allocated_irqresource(struct pnp_resource_table *res,
while (!(res->irq_resource[i].flags & IORESOURCE_UNSET) &&
i < PNP_MAX_IRQ)
i++;
- if (i >= PNP_MAX_IRQ) {
+ if (i >= PNP_MAX_IRQ && !warned) {
printk(KERN_ERR "pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of IRQ "
"resources: %d \n", PNP_MAX_IRQ);
+ warned = 1;
return;
}
/*
@@ -169,6 +171,7 @@ static void pnpacpi_parse_allocated_dmaresource(struct pnp_resource_table *res,
int bus_master, int transfer)
{
int i = 0;
+ static unsigned char warned;
while (i < PNP_MAX_DMA &&
!(res->dma_resource[i].flags & IORESOURCE_UNSET))
@@ -183,9 +186,10 @@ static void pnpacpi_parse_allocated_dmaresource(struct pnp_resource_table *res,
}
res->dma_resource[i].start = dma;
res->dma_resource[i].end = dma;
- } else {
+ } else if (!warned) {
printk(KERN_ERR "pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of DMA "
"resources: %d \n", PNP_MAX_DMA);
+ warned = 1;
}
}
@@ -193,6 +197,7 @@ static void pnpacpi_parse_allocated_ioresource(struct pnp_resource_table *res,
u64 io, u64 len, int io_decode)
{
int i = 0;
+ static unsigned char warned;
while (!(res->port_resource[i].flags & IORESOURCE_UNSET) &&
i < PNP_MAX_PORT)
@@ -207,7 +212,7 @@ static void pnpacpi_parse_allocated_ioresource(struct pnp_resource_table *res,
}
res->port_resource[i].start = io;
res->port_resource[i].end = io + len - 1;
- } else {
+ } else if (!warned) {
printk(KERN_ERR "pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of IO "
"resources: %d \n", PNP_MAX_PORT);
}
@@ -218,6 +223,7 @@ static void pnpacpi_parse_allocated_memresource(struct pnp_resource_table *res,
int write_protect)
{
int i = 0;
+ static unsigned char warned;
while (!(res->mem_resource[i].flags & IORESOURCE_UNSET) &&
(i < PNP_MAX_MEM))
@@ -233,7 +239,7 @@ static void pnpacpi_parse_allocated_memresource(struct pnp_resource_table *res,
res->mem_resource[i].start = mem;
res->mem_resource[i].end = mem + len - 1;
- } else {
+ } else if (!warned) {
printk(KERN_ERR "pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of mem "
"resources: %d\n", PNP_MAX_MEM);
}