summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>2011-08-16 09:40:01 -0700
committerNicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>2011-08-22 19:28:36 +0000
commit28638887f351d11867562322b7abaa014dd5528a (patch)
tree6540c800b66ef3045e942125e57b756053fc84b5 /drivers/target/target_core_device.c
parente63a8e1933a2218cf801e46dd01bd8cca4a555ec (diff)
downloadlinux-28638887f351d11867562322b7abaa014dd5528a.tar.gz
linux-28638887f351d11867562322b7abaa014dd5528a.tar.xz
linux-28638887f351d11867562322b7abaa014dd5528a.zip
target: Convert acl_node_lock to be IRQ-disabling
With qla2xxx, acl_node_lock is taken inside qla2xxx's hardware_lock, which is taken in hardirq context. This means acl_node_lock must become an IRQ-disabling lock; in particular this fixes lockdep warnings along the lines of ====================================================== [ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ] (&(&se_tpg->acl_node_lock)->rlock){+.....}, at: [<ffffffffa026f872>] transport_deregister_session+0x92/0x140 [target_core_mod] and this task is already holding: (&(&ha->hardware_lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffffa017c5e7>] qla_tgt_stop_phase1+0x57/0x2c0 [qla2xxx] which would create a new lock dependency: (&(&ha->hardware_lock)->rlock){-.-...} -> (&(&se_tpg->acl_node_lock)->rlock){+.....} but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock: (&(&ha->hardware_lock)->rlock){-.-...} to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: (&(&se_tpg->acl_node_lock)->rlock){+.....} Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/target/target_core_device.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/target/target_core_device.c16
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
index 4b5237f500a5..ca6e4a4df134 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
@@ -472,9 +472,9 @@ void core_clear_lun_from_tpg(struct se_lun *lun, struct se_portal_group *tpg)
struct se_dev_entry *deve;
u32 i;
- spin_lock_bh(&tpg->acl_node_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&tpg->acl_node_lock);
list_for_each_entry(nacl, &tpg->acl_node_list, acl_list) {
- spin_unlock_bh(&tpg->acl_node_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&tpg->acl_node_lock);
spin_lock_irq(&nacl->device_list_lock);
for (i = 0; i < TRANSPORT_MAX_LUNS_PER_TPG; i++) {
@@ -491,9 +491,9 @@ void core_clear_lun_from_tpg(struct se_lun *lun, struct se_portal_group *tpg)
}
spin_unlock_irq(&nacl->device_list_lock);
- spin_lock_bh(&tpg->acl_node_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&tpg->acl_node_lock);
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&tpg->acl_node_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&tpg->acl_node_lock);
}
static struct se_port *core_alloc_port(struct se_device *dev)
@@ -1372,17 +1372,17 @@ struct se_lun *core_dev_add_lun(
*/
if (tpg->se_tpg_tfo->tpg_check_demo_mode(tpg)) {
struct se_node_acl *acl;
- spin_lock_bh(&tpg->acl_node_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&tpg->acl_node_lock);
list_for_each_entry(acl, &tpg->acl_node_list, acl_list) {
if (acl->dynamic_node_acl &&
(!tpg->se_tpg_tfo->tpg_check_demo_mode_login_only ||
!tpg->se_tpg_tfo->tpg_check_demo_mode_login_only(tpg))) {
- spin_unlock_bh(&tpg->acl_node_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&tpg->acl_node_lock);
core_tpg_add_node_to_devs(acl, tpg);
- spin_lock_bh(&tpg->acl_node_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&tpg->acl_node_lock);
}
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&tpg->acl_node_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&tpg->acl_node_lock);
}
return lun_p;