| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Move this header out of the common header.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
At present dm/device.h includes the linux-compatible features. This
requires including linux/compat.h which in turn includes a lot of headers.
One of these is malloc.h which we thus end up including in every file in
U-Boot. Apart from the inefficiency of this, it is problematic for sandbox
which needs to use the system malloc() in some files.
Move the compatibility features into a separate header file.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We need distinguish the following two situations in various SPI APIs:
- given chip select num is invalid
- given chip select num is valid, but no device is attached
Currently -ENODEV is returned for both cases.
For the first case, it's more reasonable to return -EINVAL instead of
-ENODEV for invalid chip select numbers.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> # SoPine
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
|
|
This driver is a simplified version of linux/drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx.c
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@openedev.com>
|
