summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/remoteproc/rproc-uclass.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* remoteproc: Allow for individual remoteproc initializationLokesh Vutla2018-09-111-0/+19
| | | | | | | | | | | Existing rproc_init() api tries to initialize all available remoteproc devices. This will fail when there is dependency among available remoteprocs. So introduce a separate api that allows to initialize remoteprocs individually based on id. Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
* SPDX: Convert all of our single license tags to Linux Kernel styleTom Rini2018-05-071-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line) and with slightly different comment styles than us. In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style. This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag and have introduced one. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
* dm: core: Replace of_offset with accessorSimon Glass2017-02-081-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | At present devices use a simple integer offset to record the device tree node associated with the device. In preparation for supporting a live device tree, which uses a node pointer instead, refactor existing code to access this field through an inline function. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
* drivers: remoteproc: rproc-uclass: Fix check for NULL pointersNishanth Menon2015-12-051-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Neither uc_pdata->name nor check_name are supposed to be NULL in _rproc_name_is_unique(). if uc_pdata->name is NULL, we are not intialized yet, however if check_data is NULL, we do not have proper data. Further, if either were NULL, strlen will crap out while attempting to derefence NULL. Instead, just check if either of these are NULL and bail out. This should also fix the following coverity scan warnings: *** CID 132281: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) /drivers/remoteproc/rproc-uclass.c: 73 in _rproc_name_is_unique() Reported-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
* drivers: Introduce a simplified remoteproc frameworkNishanth Menon2015-10-221-0/+417
Many System on Chip(SoC) solutions are complex with multiple processors on the same die dedicated to either general purpose of specialized functions. Many examples do exist in today's SoCs from various vendors. Typical examples are micro controllers such as an ARM M3/M0 doing a offload of specific function such as event integration or power management or controlling camera etc. Traditionally, the responsibility of loading up such a processor with a firmware and communication has been with a High Level Operating System(HLOS) such as Linux. However, there exists classes of products where Linux would need to expect services from such a processor or the delay of Linux and operating system being able to load up such a firmware is unacceptable. To address these needs, we need some minimal capability to load such a system and ensure it is started prior to an Operating System(Linux or any other) is started up. NOTE: This is NOT meant to be a solve-all solution, instead, it tries to address certain class of SoCs and products that need such a solution. A very simple model is introduced here as part of the initial support that supports microcontrollers with internal memory (no MMU, no execution from external memory, or specific image format needs). This basic framework can then (hopefully) be extensible to other complex SoC processor support as need be. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>