Add initial support for Compulab iot-gate-imx8 board (imx8mm-cl-iot-gate).
The initial support includes:
 - MMC
 - eMMC
 - I2C
 - FEC
 - Serial console

Signed-off-by: Kirill Kapranov <kirill.kapranov@compulab.co.il>
Signed-off-by: Uri Mashiach <uri.mashiach@compulab.co.il>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Raevsky <valentin@compulab.co.il>
Signed-off-by: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) <paul.liu@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>

Historically, the reset_cpu() function had an `addr` parameter which was
meant to pass in an address of the reset vector location, where the CPU
should reset to.  This feature is no longer used anywhere in U-Boot as
all reset_cpu() implementations now ignore the passed value.  Generic
code has been added which always calls reset_cpu() with `0` which means
this feature can no longer be used easily anyway.

Over time, many implementations seem to have "misunderstood" the
existence of this parameter as a way to customize/parameterize the reset
(e.g.  COLD vs WARM resets).  As this is not properly supported, the
code will almost always not do what it is intended to (because all
call-sites just call reset_cpu() with 0).

To avoid confusion and to clean up the codebase from unused left-overs
of the past, remove the `addr` parameter entirely.  Code which intends
to support different kinds of resets should be rewritten as a sysreset
driver instead.

This transformation was done with the following coccinelle patch:

    @@
    expression argvalue;
    @@
    - reset_cpu(argvalue)
    + reset_cpu()

    @@
    identifier argname;
    type argtype;
    @@
    - reset_cpu(argtype argname)
    + reset_cpu(void)
    { ... }

Signed-off-by: Harald Seiler <hws@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Move this out of the common header and include it only where needed.  In
a number of cases this requires adding "struct udevice;" to avoid adding
another large header or in other cases replacing / adding missing header
files that had been pulled in, very indirectly.   Finally, we have a few
cases where we did not need to include <asm/global_data.h> at all, so
remove that include.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

The current macro is a misnomer since it does not declare a device
directly. Instead, it declares driver_info record which U-Boot uses at
runtime to create a device.

The distinction seems somewhat minor most of the time, but is becomes
quite confusing when we actually want to declare a device, with
of-platdata. We are left trying to distinguish between a device which
isn't actually device, and a device that is (perhaps an 'instance'?)

It seems better to rename this macro to describe what it actually is. The
macros is not widely used, since boards should use devicetree to declare
devices.

Rename it to U_BOOT_DRVINFO(), which indicates clearly that this is
declaring a new driver_info record, not a device.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Try to maintain some consistency between these variables by using _plat as
a suffix for them.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

We use 'priv' for private data but often use 'platdata' for platform data.
We can't really use 'pdata' since that is ambiguous (it could mean private
or platform data).

Rename some of the latter variables to end with 'plat' for consistency.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

  It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

  void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

  #include <asm/u-boot.h>
  void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

  struct bd_info;
  void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

  <smpl>
  @@
  typedef bd_t;
  @@
  -bd_t
  +struct bd_info
  </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

DM, DM_SPI and other driver model migration deadlines
are expired for this board.

Remove it.

Cc: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>

DM, DM_SPI and other driver model migration deadlines
are expired for this board.

Remove it.

Cc: Dmitry Lifshitz <lifshitz@compulab.co.il>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>

Move this uncommon header out of the common header.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>